Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct;18(10):e012663.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012663. Epub 2025 Jul 2.

Mid-Term Reassessment of Waitlist and Posttransplant Outcomes Under the 2018 Heart Allocation System: Improved All-Cause Survival

Affiliations

Mid-Term Reassessment of Waitlist and Posttransplant Outcomes Under the 2018 Heart Allocation System: Improved All-Cause Survival

Yeahwa Hong et al. Circ Heart Fail. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates clinical trends and mid-term waitlist and posttransplant outcomes following the 2018 heart allocation policy change.

Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to analyze adult waitlisted and transplanted patients undergoing isolated heart transplantation. Two analyses were conducted: (1) waitlist and (2) posttransplant outcomes. For the waitlist analysis, candidates were stratified into seasonally matched prepolicy (October 18, 2012-June 30, 2017) and postpolicy (October 18, 2018-June 30, 2023) groups, with a 1-year follow-up period. Waitlist outcomes included 1-year cumulative incidences of transplantation, delisting due to death/clinical deterioration, and all-cause survival from the initial waitlisting. For the posttransplant analysis, recipients were stratified into seasonally matched prepolicy (October 18, 2014-June 30, 2018) and postpolicy (October 18, 2018-June 30, 2020) groups, with a 4-year follow-up period. Posttransplant outcomes included 4-year survival. Propensity score-matching and multivariable Cox regression were used for risk adjustment.

Results: Under the 2018 allocation system, there was a continued shift toward the use of older donors, longer graft ischemic times, and shorter waitlist durations. In the waitlist analysis, 30 620 waitlisted candidates were analyzed, with 14 908 (48.7%) listed after the policy change. The postpolicy candidates had a higher 1-year cumulative incidence of transplantation (subhazard ratio, 2.06 [95% CI, 2.00-2.12]; P<0.001) and a lower 1-year cumulative incidence of delisting (subhazard ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.53-0.63]; P<0.001) compared with the prepolicy candidates. In addition, the postpolicy candidates had significantly improved 1-year survival from initial waitlisting compared with the prepolicy candidates (90.0% versus 86.8%; P<0.001). In the posttransplant analysis, 13 712 recipients were analyzed, with 4597 (33.5%) transplanted following the policy change. The 4-year post-transplant survival was similar between the groups (83.3% versus 82.8%; P=0.593). Furthermore, the comparable 4-year post-transplant survival persisted in the propensity score-matched comparison and multivariable Cox regression.

Conclusions: Despite the changes in donor and recipient profiles following the 2018 allocation system change, this mid-term reassessment demonstrates its success in significantly improving waitlist survival, while maintaining comparable posttransplant survival.

Keywords: heart failure; heart transplantation; policy; survival; tissue and organ procurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Kaczorowski received consultant and speaking fees for Medtronic and Abiomed and research funding from Abiomed, XVIVO, and TransMedics. The other authors report no conflicts.

Comment in

LinkOut - more resources