Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Aug;10(4):1253-1259.
doi: 10.1002/epi4.70091. Epub 2025 Jul 3.

Effect of levetiracetam on cognition in patients with cognitive decline: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of levetiracetam on cognition in patients with cognitive decline: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Claudia Faini et al. Epilepsia Open. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) compared to placebo in improving cognitive performance in people with cognitive decline. The protocol was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD420250656389) and reporting followed PRISMA guidelines. We searched RCTs that enrolled adult patients with cognitive decline, of any stage, comparing LEV to placebo or other active substance, and which reported at least one of the following primary or secondary outcomes: clinical dementia rating scale (CDR) or its sub-items; language, verbal memory/memory, executive, visuo-spatial and multi-domain cognitive test results. Studies were assessed for bias against the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. A meta-analysis was conducted using mean difference (MD) or standardized MD (SMD) according to the available scales. Meta-analysis of binary outcomes was used to compare adverse events. Overall, 6 RCTs provided data for 283 participants. LEV was not associated with a significant improvement in cognitive function measured by CDR-SB compared to placebo (MD = 0.04, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.31, I2 = 0%, n studies = 2). LEV significantly improved visuospatial function (SMD = -0.25, 95% CI = -0.49 to -0.01, I2 = 0%, n studies = 2) and marginally improved executive function (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI = -0.63 to +0.05, I2 = 0%, n studies = 3). Importantly, no differences between LEV and placebo emerged in terms of adverse events. LEV was well tolerated in people with cognitive impairment. Although LEV did not improve global cognitive function, there were improvements in visuospatial function and, more marginally, executive function. Further studies are needed to assess LEV in larger cohorts of people with cognitive impairment, with application of standardized testing paradigms. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Levetiracetam (LEV) is a medication commonly used to treat epilepsy. As has emerged from clinical and neuroimaging studies, some people with neurocognitive disorders have abnormal brain activity, especially in the temporal lobes, which may worsen cognitive decline. We reviewed clinical trials testing whether LEV could help improve cognitive function in people with cognitive decline. Overall, LEV was well tolerated and did not lead to more side effects than placebo. While LEV did not improve general cognitive function, some studies reported small improvements in visuospatial and executive domains. More research in larger studies is needed to understand if LEV can benefit cognition in these individuals.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; cognitive decline; cognitive testing; dementia; epilepsy; levetiracetam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
CDR sum of boxes score mean difference in LEV vs. placebo. CI, confidence interval; LEV, levetiracetam.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Meta‐analysis of the effect of LEV versus placebo on secondary outcomes and adverse events. CI, confidence interval; LEV, levetiracetam; RR, risk ratio. Meta‐analyses (A–D) are based on standardized mean (Hedges' g). Meta‐analysis of adverse events is based on risk ratio. The classification of cognitive tests into domain‐specific meta‐analyses is detailed in Table S2.

References

    1. Romoli M, Sen A, Parnetti L, Calabresi P, Costa C. Amyloid‐β: a potential link between epilepsy and cognitive decline. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17:469–485. - PubMed
    1. Sen A, Romoli M. Pathological brain ageing in epilepsy and dementia: two sides of the same coin? Brain. 2021;144:9–11. - PubMed
    1. Toniolo S, Romoli M, Sen A. Epilepsy in older persons. Neurol Clin. 2022;40:891–905. - PubMed
    1. Vossel KA, Tartaglia MC, Nygaard HB, Zeman AZ, Miller BL. Epileptic activity in Alzheimer's disease: causes and clinical relevance. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:311–322. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vossel KA, Beagle AJ, Rabinovici GD, Shu H, Lee SE, Naasan G, et al. Seizures and epileptiform activity in the early stages of Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70:1158–1166. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms