Benefits of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Mechanisms to Restore Function and Clinical Impact
- PMID: 40608851
- PMCID: PMC12233141
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.125.325705
Benefits of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Mechanisms to Restore Function and Clinical Impact
Abstract
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has evolved from foundations as a postmyocardial infarction mobilization strategy for patients who were typically unstable, into a comprehensive, multidisciplinary program for most patients with cardiovascular disease aimed at optimizing cardiovascular health, reducing morbidity, and enhancing functional recovery. Although contemporary CR patients are now usually more stable from a cardiovascular perspective, needs have expanded for comprehensive approaches to exercise, lifestyle, care coordination, risk factor modification, and stress management. Furthermore, contemporary CR patients now typically include older adults who are contending with cardiovascular disease in the context of multimorbidity, frailty, sarcopenia, sensory limits, and cognitive impairment. The physiological mechanisms underlying exercise intolerance in cardiovascular disease include impairments in cardiac output, vascular function, and skeletal muscle metabolism and relate to elemental biological mechanisms that are common to all 3 as well as to noncardiovascular disease and aging. CR provides an important opportunity to address such aggregate risk. Nonetheless, CR remains underutilized, particularly by older adults, women, and those struggling with cognitive impairments, frailty, logistics, and social barriers to care. Emerging strategies, such as home-based and hybrid CR models, resistance training, and digital health technologies, are expanding the potential for access and effectiveness. Future research brings important opportunities to hone personalized CR strategies tailored to contemporary patient populations, including optimized exercise prescriptions as well as pharmacological, nutritional, and technological adjuncts. Related prospects to distinguish the biological mechanisms underlying patient-preferred clinical end points (eg, independence, quality of life) remain critical to augmenting CR's value in the contemporary therapeutic landscape.
Keywords: aging; cardiovascular diseases; digital health; quality of life; sarcopenia.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
References
-
- Leighton LS. The Story of the “Cardiac Chair” and the Resistance to Its Use in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction, 1950 to 1961. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2017;120:1674–1680. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.070 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- P30 AG024827/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG060499/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- I21 RX004409/RX/RRD VA/United States
- I01 HX003518/HX/HSRD VA/United States
- R01 AG073633/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- K23 HL153771/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG077179/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R01 HL132887/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG058883/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- IHS-2021C3-24147/PCORI/Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute/United States
- U19 AG065188/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- P30 AG021334/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical