Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 19;406(10500):283-294.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01186-9. Epub 2025 Jun 30.

Evaluating the impact of two decades of USAID interventions and projecting the effects of defunding on mortality up to 2030: a retrospective impact evaluation and forecasting analysis

Affiliations

Evaluating the impact of two decades of USAID interventions and projecting the effects of defunding on mortality up to 2030: a retrospective impact evaluation and forecasting analysis

Daniella Medeiros Cavalcanti et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: The US Agency for International Development (USAID) is the largest funding agency for humanitarian and development aid worldwide. The aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the effect of all USAID funding on adult and child mortality over the past two decades and forecast the future effect of its defunding.

Methods: In this retrospective impact evaluation integrated with forecasting analysis, we used panel data from 133 countries and territories- including all low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs)-with USAID support ranging from none to very high. First, we used fixed-effects multivariable Poisson models with robust SEs adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and health-care factors to estimate the impact of USAID funding on all-age and all-cause mortality from 2001 to 2021. Second, we evaluated its effects by age-specific, sex-specific, and cause-specific groups. Third, we did several sensitivity and triangulation analyses. Lastly, we integrated the retrospective evaluation with validated dynamic microsimulation models to estimate effects up to 2030.

Findings: Higher levels of USAID funding-primarily directed toward LMICs, particularly African countries-were associated with a 15% reduction in age-standardised all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0·85, 95% CI 0·78-0·93) and a 32% reduction in under-five mortality (RR 0·68, 0·57-0·80). This finding indicates that 91 839 663 (95% CI 85 690 135-98 291 626) all-age deaths, including 30 391 980 (26 023 132-35 482 636) in children younger than 5 years, were prevented by USAID funding over the 21-year study period. USAID funding was associated with a 65% reduction (RR 0·35, 0·29-0·42) in mortality from HIV/AIDS (representing 25·5 million deaths), 51% (RR 0·49, 0·39-0·61) from malaria (8·0 million deaths), and 50% (RR 0·50, 0·40-0·62) from neglected tropical diseases (8·9 million deaths). Significant decreases were also observed in mortality from tuberculosis, nutritional deficiencies, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, and maternal and perinatal conditions. Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990-19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796-5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.

Interpretation: USAID funding has significantly contributed to the reduction in adult and child mortality across low-income and middle-income countries over the past two decades. Our estimates show that, unless the abrupt funding cuts announced and implemented in the first half of 2025 are reversed, a staggering number of avoidable deaths could occur by 2030.

Funding: The Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, UK Medical Research Council, and EU Horizon Europe.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rate ratios from the fixed-effect Poisson models for the association between specific causes of death related to USAID focus areas and USAID funding per capita per year All models were adjusted for covariates (table 2; appendix p 27). To estimate the number of deaths averted by USAID between 2001 and 2021, we simulated a counterfactual scenario in which USAID funding was set to zero, while keeping all other variables constant. We predicted the coefficient E(Yit | X), where X represents the set of covariates including the interventions and Yit the mortality at country i, in year t. Thus, 100 000 Monte Carlo simulations were used to get a more accurate CI (appendix pp 37–38). USAID=US Agency for International Development.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average per capita USAID disbursement from 2001 to 2021, by quartile, across 133 low-income, lower-income and middle-income, and upper-middle-income countries and territories (A), and deaths (all ages) prevented by USAID implementation as a percentage of the total over the study period 2001–21 USAID disbursement (in quartiles; A) and deaths prevented by USAID, 2001–21 as a percentage (B). USAID=US Agency for International Development.

References

    1. McCabe EM. US Agency for International Development: an overview (CRS report no. IF10261) 2025. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF10261
    1. US Foreign Assistance Dashboard US Agency for International Development (USAID) April 11, 2025. https://foreignassistance.gov/
    1. Kates J, Rouw A, Oum S, Wexler A. KFF; Feb 7, 2025. How much global health funding goes through USAID?https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/how-much-global-health-funding-goes-thr...
    1. Heath V. USAID: the successful projects that changed lives around the world. Geographical. Feb 26, 2025. https://geographical.co.uk/news/usaid-the-successful-projects-that-chang...
    1. The White House Reevaluating and realigning United States foreign aid. Jan 20, 2025. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/reevaluating-and...

LinkOut - more resources