Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):1087.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06154-4.

First Dental Steps intervention: feasibility study of a health visitor led infant oral health improvement programme

Affiliations

First Dental Steps intervention: feasibility study of a health visitor led infant oral health improvement programme

Joanna G Williams et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: In England, dental caries is common (22.4% of 5-year-olds, 2024) and the primary reason for hospital admission of children. First Dental Steps (FDS), an intervention in South West England, includes training for health visitors, integrating oral health advice into home visits and provision of oral health packs (a free flow cup, toothbrush and 1450ppm fluoride toothpaste) to vulnerable families at the 1-year developmental check. The aim was to conduct a feasibility study of FDS to support parents to increase infant toothbrushing.

Methods: This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of the FDS intervention and research methods in 5 local authority areas in South West England and 4 comparison sites. Data collection (June 2021-February 2022) included baseline and follow-up questionnaires (mean 5 months), semi-structured interviews with parents (n = 16), health visitors (n = 7), and stakeholders (n = 16). Analysis of questionnaires was descriptive, and interviews were analysed using the framework method.

Results: Parents completed baseline (n = 59) and follow-up questionnaires (n = 26), with 10 parents (40%) reporting an increase in brushing frequency and 4 families (15%) reported visiting a dentist. From the interview data, five themes were identified 1) acceptability of the intervention, 2) feasibility of the intervention (delivery and implementation), 3) possible benefits of the intervention, 4) acceptability of study methods, and 5) suggested improvements. The FDS intervention was seen to be acceptable and feasible to those who took part, however, challenges with recruitment and retention demonstrate that obtaining data for a full trial would not be feasible.

Conclusions: Parents, health visitors and stakeholders who took part in our study found FDS to be acceptable and feasible. Recruitment, retention and study methods (completing participant flow table) were challenging, and the progression criteria for the research methods were not met to progress to a full trial. Modifications were recommended to improve the intervention and further co-production approaches could be used to ensure it is culturally appropriate in a diverse population.

Keywords: Children under 5-years; Dental; Dental caries; Health visiting; Oral health; Public Health nursing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was granted ethical approval via the Health Research Authority (HRA) IRAS system (IRAS project ID: 292280) and The North of Scotland Research Ethics Service. Participants were fully informed of the steps involved in the research and that participation was completely voluntary and they could withdraw at any point without giving a reason. Participants were provided with the option to sign an electronic or paper-based consent form. Health visitors explained the study and assisted the families with signing consent, where necessary. Families gave consent to be involved in the study and provided additional consent to complete the telephone interview. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
First Dental Steps Intervention

Similar articles

References

    1. Watt RG, Daly B, Allison P, Macpherson LMD, Venturelli R, Listl S, et al. Ending the neglect of global oral health: time for radical action. Lancet. 2019;394:261–72. - PubMed
    1. Peres MA, Macpherson LMD, Weyant RJ, Daly B, Venturelli R, Mathur MR, et al. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet. 2019;394:249–60. - PubMed
    1. National Dental Epidemiology Programme (NDEP) for England: oral health survey of 5 year old schoolchildren 2024. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/oral-health-survey-of-5-year-ol.... Accessed 4 March 2025
    1. Rodd H, Hall M, Deery C, Gilchrist F, Gibson B, Marshman Z. Video diaries to capture children’s participation in the dental GA pathway. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013;14:325–30. - PubMed
    1. Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-better-oral-health.... Access date - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources