Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 19:19:1566835.
doi: 10.3389/fnana.2025.1566835. eCollection 2025.

A domain-based framework for cognitive profile identification in Parkinson's disease across diverse samples

Affiliations

A domain-based framework for cognitive profile identification in Parkinson's disease across diverse samples

Elvira Andújar-Castillo et al. Front Neuroanat. .

Abstract

Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor symptoms and heterogeneous cognitive impairments influenced by factors such as age, disease duration, and severity. Traditional neuropsychological assessments often fall short in capturing the multifaceted nature of PD-related cognitive dysfunction due to their reliance on single test metrics. This study provides empirical support for the implementation of domain-based cognitive assessments, structured in line with Movement Disorder Society recommendations, to provide a multidimensional evaluation of cognitive profiles in PD patients.

Methods: Neuropsychological and clinical data were analyzed from 316 PD patients recruited from three Spanish hospitals-Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid), the University Complejo Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (Galicia), and Hospital Virgen del Rocío (Sevilla)- and a control group of 96 older individuals, whose age difference from the PD group was statistically significant. Five cognitive domains were constructed, addressing attention/working memory, executive functions, memory, visuospatial abilities, and language, using composite z-scores derived from standardized neuropsychological tests.

Results: Latent Cluster Analysis identified three distinct cognitive profiles: (1) a fronto-striatal profile characterized by mild deficits in executive and attention functions and intact visuospatial abilities, (2) a posterior cortical profile marked by severe memory and visuospatial impairments but strong language performance, and (3) a preserved profile displaying mild deficits across multiple domains. Comparisons between PD clusters and controls revealed significant differences in cognitive trajectories, emphasizing the value of a domain-based approach for differentiating neurodegenerative patterns from normal aging.

Discussion: The findings highlight the potential of domain-based assessments to unify data across diverse samples, fostering standardized cross-cohort comparisons and facilitating large-scale research initiatives. By enabling methodological consistency, this approach provides a robust framework for advancing the understanding of cognitive dysfunctions in PD and improving clinical decision-making.

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; aging; cognitive domains; deep brain stimulation; latent cluster analysis; neuropsychological assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) Shows a representation of the neuropsychological profiles of the three clusters identified in the control group. (B) Represents the profiles of the three neuropsychological clusters identified in the PD group. (C) Shows the overall cognitive profile comparison between the control group and the entire PD group. (D) Compares the three PD clusters with the control group. The figures display scores across neuropsychological domains: ATT/WM, attention/working memory; MEM, memory; EF, executive functions; VOSP, visuospatial function, and LANG, language. Dots closer to the center of the pentagon indicate higher (i.e., better) cognitive scores, while dots farther from the center represent poorer (more negative) scores.

References

    1. Aracil-Bolaños I., Sampedro F., Marín-Lahoz J., Horta-Barba A., Martínez-Horta S., Botí M., et al. (2019). A divergent breakdown of neurocognitive networks in Parkinson’s disease mild cognitive impairment. Hum. Brain Mapp. 40 3233–3242. 10.1002/hbm.24593 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baiano C., Barone P., Trojano L., Santangelo G. (2020). Prevalence and clinical aspects of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis. Movement Disord. 35 45–54. 10.1002/mds.27902 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benton A. L. (1945). A visual retention test forr clinical use. Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry 54 212–216. 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1945.02300090051008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benton A. L. (1994). Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment: A Clinical Manual. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    1. Berg E. A. (1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J. General Psychol. 39 15–22. 10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources