Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 2;12(3):e70312.
doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70312. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Optimal flexion angle for graft fixation in lateral extra-articular tenodesis combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review

Riccardo Compagnoni  1   2 , Antonio Klasan  3   4 , Alberto Grassi  5 , Francesco Puglia  6 , Stefano Zaffagnini  5 , Pietro Simone Randelli  1   7 , Jacques Menetrey  8   9
Affiliations
Review

Optimal flexion angle for graft fixation in lateral extra-articular tenodesis combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review

Riccardo Compagnoni et al. J Exp Orthop. .

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review aims to investigate the knee flexion angles used for graft fixation in lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and their impact on clinical outcomes.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to February 2024. The inclusion criteria were original clinical studies (levels I-IV evidence) with at least 12 months of follow-up, reporting knee flexion angles during LET graft fixation in ACLR. Exclusion criteria included non-English articles, reviews, biomechanical studies, and case reports. Data on study design, patient numbers, fixation angles, and clinical outcomes were extracted, and study quality was assessed using the RoB 2 tool.

Results: Out of 1134 studies identified, 21 met the inclusion criteria. The reported flexion angles for LET graft fixation ranged from full extension to 90°. Ten studies fixed the graft at 30°, consistently showing improved knee stability, reduced pivot-shift rates, and better functional outcomes, especially in high-risk patients. Three studies focused on graft fixation at 45° of flexion. Another four studies investigated fixation at 60° of knee flexion. Lastly, two studies assessed outcomes with fixation at 90°.

Conclusion: LET combined with ACLR effectively restores knee stability across various flexion angles. While fixation at 30° is most commonly associated with positive outcomes, the lack of consensus on an optimal angle reflects differences in surgical techniques and patient-specific factors. Further prospective research with long-term follow-up is needed to validate these findings and guide clinical practice toward optimal knee flexion angles for graft fixation in LET procedures.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Keywords: ACLR; Lemaire; angle; graft; lateral extra‐articular tenodesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection criteria flow chart. *Not specifically examine only the lateral extra‐articular tenodesis (LET) combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) or revision; cadaveric study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ahn JH, Kim J, Mun JW. A retrospective comparison of single‐bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral extra‐articular tenodesis with double‐bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(3):976–984. - PubMed
    1. Alm L, Drenck TC, Frosch K‐H, Akoto R. Lateral extra‐articular tenodesis in patients with revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and high‐grade anterior knee instability. Knee. 2020;27(5):1451–1457. - PubMed
    1. Behrendt P, Fahlbusch H, Akoto R, Thürig G, Frings J, Herbst E, et al. Comparison of onlay anchor fixation versus transosseous fixation for lateral extra‐articular tenodesis during revision ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023;11(5):232596712311663. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Branch T, Lavoie F, Guier C, Branch E, Lording T, Stinton S, et al. Single‐bundle ACL reconstruction with and without extra‐articular reconstruction: evaluation with robotic lower leg rotation testing and patient satisfaction scores. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(10):2882–2891. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castoldi M, Magnussen RA, Gunst S, Batailler C, Neyret P, Lustig S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of bone–patellar tendon–bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without lateral extra‐articular tenodesis: 19‐year clinical and radiological follow‐up. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(7):1665–1672. - PubMed