Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 25:12:30502225251304582.
doi: 10.1177/30502225251304582. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

The Global Burden of Major Gastrointestinal Anomalies: A Global, Systematic Review of Gastrointestinal Anomaly Birth Prevalence

Affiliations
Review

The Global Burden of Major Gastrointestinal Anomalies: A Global, Systematic Review of Gastrointestinal Anomaly Birth Prevalence

Kelsey R Landrum et al. Sage Open Pediatr. .

Abstract

The burden of congenital gastrointestinal (GI) anomalies is poorly understood. The aim of this systematic review to assess the global prevalence of congenital gastrointestinal (GI) anomalies. We conducted a systematic review of global population-level birth prevalence of gastroschisis, omphalocele, intestinal atresia, esophageal atresia, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, Hirschsprung's disease, and anorectal malformation. We identified 103 studies from high and middle-income countries. Gastroschisis was the most reported condition. Studies reported geographic heterogeneity in gastroschisis, omphalocele, esophageal atresia, Hirschsprung's disease, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, and anorectal malformation prevalence. The prevalence of gastroschisis, omphalocele, and Hirschsprung's disease prevalence was reported to have increased over recent decades. Mean prevalence per 10 000 live and total births ranged from 2.1 to 4.4 cases and 1.4 to 3.6 per 10 000 live or total births, respectively. There is limited surveillance for congenital GI anomalies in LICs and potential temporal and geographic trends that need to be further investigated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA-P diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Map of studies identified and included in this review.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Number of ascertained major gastrointestinal anomaly birth prevalence studies by publication year.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bhide P, Gund P, Kar A. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in an Indian maternal cohort: healthcare, prevention, and surveillance implications. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0166408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166408 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stone DH, Dastgiri S, Heidarzadeh M, Abdollahi HM, Imani S, Maher MHK. Uses, limitations, and validity of a registry of congenital anomalies in Iran: a critical review. J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:1-6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landrum K, Cotache-Condor CF, Liu Y, et al. Global Initiative for Children's Surgery. Global and regional overview of the inclusion of paediatric surgery in the national health plans of 124 countries: an ecological study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e045981. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strengthening Emergency and Essential Surgical Care and Anaesthesia as a Component of Universal Health Coverage . 6 https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/253244 (2015).
    1. Kids Operating Room Global Report: The Unmet Need of Children’s Surgery in 2022 . 15 https://www.kidsor.org/our-work/research-and-impact/global-reports/ (2022).

LinkOut - more resources