Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 2;14(7):e70043.
doi: 10.1002/cti2.70043. eCollection 2025.

The role of immunochemotherapy maintenance in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: insights from a cohort study in an endemic region

Affiliations

The role of immunochemotherapy maintenance in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: insights from a cohort study in an endemic region

Zhuoying Luo et al. Clin Transl Immunology. .

Abstract

Objectives: Metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) following palliative chemotherapy has high incidence and mortality rates. While maintenance therapy shows promising potential, the optimal strategy remains undefined. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of immunochemotherapy maintenance in patients with mNPC.

Methods: This cohort study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of combined maintenance therapy with capecitabine and anti-PD-1 antibodies in mNPC patients, using a prospectively maintained database. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival and safety profile. Furthermore, stratification analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed.

Results: The study included 300 mNPC patients treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2018 to 2023. Two hundred and thirty-four patients (78.0%) were male, and the median age was 45 years [interquartile range (IQR): 36-54]. At median follow-up of 43.6 months (IQR: 31.8-57.8), combination maintenance significantly improved PFS compared to single-drug maintenance [weighted hazard ratio (HR) 0.580, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.387-0.872, P = 0.009; E-value, 2.27]. Stratification analysis revealed enhanced efficacy of immunochemotherapy maintenance in patients without prior local treatment (HR 0.414, 95% CI 0.224-0.767, P = 0.005) or with elevated premaintenance Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels (HR 0.063, 95% CI 0.007-0.548, P = 0.012). No significant difference in PFS was observed between the capecitabine and anti-PD-1 single-agent groups. Notably, combination therapy yielded significantly longer PFS than either single-drug regimen. The safety profile was similar between combination maintenance and single-drug groups.

Conclusions: Combined maintenance therapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies and capecitabine may be a feasible treatment strategy for mNPC patients.

Keywords: adjuvant drug therapy; combined modality therapy; metastasis; nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study design. A total of 300 eligible patients were retrospectively recruited for our study at Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center from 2018 to 2023. Three maintenance strategies were included in our study: anti‐PD‐1 monoclonal antibodies (n = 94), capecitabine (n = 117) and the combination of anti‐PD‐1 monoclonal antibodies and capecitabine (n = 89). NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma; SYSUCC, Sun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progression‐free survival (a) and overall survival (b) of patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving combined immunochemotherapy maintenance compared to single‐drug maintenance therapy. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plots for the multivariable Cox regression analysis for progression‐free survival. The HRs and 95% CIs were calculated based on the multivariable Cox analysis. CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; PCT, palliative chemotherapy; PFS, progression‐free‐survival; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Progression‐free survival (a, b) and overall survival (c, d) of patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving combined immunochemotherapy maintenance compared to single‐drug maintenance: anti‐PD‐1 monoclonal antibodies (a, c) and capecitabine (b, d). CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74: 229–263. - PubMed
    1. Sun XS, Liu SL, Luo MJ et al. The association between the development of radiation therapy, image technology, and chemotherapy, and the survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cohort study from 1990 to 2012. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105: 581–590. - PubMed
    1. Wong KCW, Hui EP, Lo K‐W et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18: 679–695. - PubMed
    1. Chen Y‐P, Chan ATC, Le Q‐T, Blanchard P, Sun Y, Ma J. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 2019; 394: 64–80. - PubMed
    1. Zhang L, Huang Y, Hong S et al. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicentre, randomised, open‐label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016; 388: 1883–1892. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources