Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct:191:112274.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112274. Epub 2025 Jun 28.

Automatic prostate volume estimation in transabdominal ultrasound images

Affiliations
Free article

Automatic prostate volume estimation in transabdominal ultrasound images

Tiziano Natali et al. Eur J Radiol. 2025 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer is a major health concern requiring accurate and accessible methods for early detection and risk stratification. Prostate volume (PV) is a key parameter in multivariate risk assessment, traditionally measured using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). While TRUS provides precise measurements, its invasive nature affects patient comfort. Transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) offers a non-invasive alternative but is limited by lower image quality and operator dependence. This study presents a deep-learning-based framework for automatic PV estimation using TAUS, aiming to improve non-invasive prostate cancer risk stratification.

Methods: A dataset of TAUS videos from 100 patients (median age 67, 95-percentile range 55-81.2) was curated, with expert-delineated prostate boundaries and diameter calculations as ground truth. The framework integrates deep-learning models for prostate segmentation in both axial and sagittal planes, automatic diameter estimation, and PV calculation. Segmentation performance was evaluated using Dice correlation coefficient (%) and Hausdorff distance (mm), while volume estimation accuracy was assessed through volumetric error (mL).

Results: The axial model outperformed the sagittal model, achieving a Dice score of 0.76 ± 0.16 versus 0.68 ± 0.21, a Dice-MidPlane of 0.91 ± 0.06 versus 0.83. ± 0.10, and a Hausdorff distance of 6.21 ± 4.33 mm versus 7.93 ± 4.27 mm. The framework estimated PV with a mean volumetric error of -2.1 mL (95 % limits of agreement: -16.9 to 21.1 mL), resulting in a relative error smaller than 25 %.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential of deep learning for accurate, non-invasive PV estimation, supporting improved prostate cancer risk assessment.

Keywords: Early detection; Prostate cancer; Segmentation; Ultrasound imaging; Volume estimation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

LinkOut - more resources