Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 5;24(1):159.
doi: 10.1186/s12934-025-02783-0.

Biological activities of optimized biosynthesized selenium nanoparticles using Proteus mirabilis PQ350419 alone or combined with chitosan and ampicillin against common multidrug-resistant bacteria

Affiliations

Biological activities of optimized biosynthesized selenium nanoparticles using Proteus mirabilis PQ350419 alone or combined with chitosan and ampicillin against common multidrug-resistant bacteria

Laila A Elshikiby et al. Microb Cell Fact. .

Abstract

Background: One of the most common issues in the world is bacterial resistance and biofilms, which can prolong the healing period and the need for self-medication. Additionally, they may be linked to unsuccessful therapies, which raises death rates, healthcare expenses, and the need for additional hospitalization. Therefore, to protect the environment and improve human health, there is a need for the creative synthesis of novel antibacterial materials. Proteus mirabilis strain PQ350419 was isolated, identified, and utilized as an efficient bio-nano-factory for biosynthesizing selenium nanoparticles (Se NPs) and optimizing procedures. This study showcases a simple and cost-effective approach for green-synthesizing a selenium/chitosan/ampicillin nanocomposite (Se/CS/AMP) as a novel antibacterial and antibiofilm agent. Several analyses, such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, zeta analysis, and ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy, were utilized to confirm and characterize the production of Se NPs and Se/CS/AMP. The absorption peaks for Se NPs and Se/CS/AMP were identified to be between 350 and 360 nm. The XRD data revealed the crystalline composition of the Se NPs loaded with CS and AMP. The FTIR spectra confirmed the presence of proteins that act as supporting and binding agents during synthesis. The stability of the prepared nanomaterials is improved by a strong negative surface charge of - 24.27 mV for Se NPs and - 23.92 mV for Se/CS/AMP. The particle sizes of Se NPs and Se/CS/AMP are shown by TEM to be in the ranges of 88-98 nm and 86-129 nm, respectively. Se NPs, either alone or in combination with chitosan (CS) and ampicillin (AMP), exhibited strong antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43,300, Bacillus cereus ATCC 14,579, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 11,296, and P. mirabilis PQ350419 in a dose-dependent manner. Compared to Se NPs and the common antibiotic AMP, the Se/CS/AMP combination demonstrated superior antibacterial activity. In comparison to Se NPs (40, 70, 110, and 150 µg/ml, respectively), the nanocomposite produced MIC values of 30, 40, 60, and 100 µg/ml against B. cereus, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, and P. mirabilis. When compared to untreated cells, treated cells exhibited significant morphological changes and deformities, such as cell wall distortion, the separation of the cell wall from the plasma membrane, the formation of vacuoles, and complete cell lysis, according to TEM ultrastructure studies of bacteria treated with nanocomposite. Se/CS/AMP at 100 µg/ml was sufficient to prevent biofilm formation by up to 50% in S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, and P. mirabilis. The cell viability of the Vero cell line was significantly reduced (p˂0.05) in the cytotoxicity test of Se NPs alone at a concentration of 40.95 ± 2.34 µg/ml, and in its nanocomposite at a concentration of 199.09 ± 2.61 µg/ml. This indicates the nanocomposite's safety by showing its minimal harmful impact on the Vero cell line.

Conclusion: Se/CS/AMP has revealed an antibacterial and antibiofilm agent that could be useful in various industrial, medicinal, and environmental applications. This study introduces a work that presents an alternative, safe, promising, and efficient nanocomposite for treating harmful bacteria in humans and animals. This treatment is based on the synergistic effectiveness of Se NPs, CS, and AMP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was carried out in accordance with the guidelines and regulations of the scientific research ethics committee, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, Egypt. Written informed consent for enrolment, screening, and specimen collection was obtained from each patient or their parents or guardians. The data of the specimens were not exposed. The cytotoxicity experiments were conducted in compliance with the IACUC (The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee) statement for using animals in research and teaching by the local ethical committee of AUHA (Al-Azhar University Housing Animals). Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
P. mirabilis isolates biofilm formation. * indicates considerably higher biofilms than those under control conditions (P < 0.05)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
UV–Vis spectroscopy and change in color studies during the formation of Se NPs using P. mirabilis isolates. (B) The reaction mixture at the beginning of the Se NPs production
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
P. mirabilis AUF1 bacterial strain’s 16S rRNA sequences were used to create the phylogenetic tree. A bootstrap of 100 replicates was used to determine the number of branch nodes. Bootstrap values greater than 50% are shown. The strain of the genus Proteus was employed as an out-group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Optimization of Se NPs production using P. mirabilis PQ350419. (A) Concentrations (5–10 mM) of Na2SeO3. (B) Effect of different mixing ratio between cell-free bacterial metabolites and Na2SeO3 (1:1–1:10 v/v%). (C) Different incubation periods through Se NPs biosynthesis. (D) Effect of temperature (10–50 °C). (E) Effect of different pH value on Se NPs formation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
FTIR spectra of cell-free P. mirabilis PQ350419 metabolites, CS, Se NPs, and Se/CS/AMP
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
XRD patterns of Se NPs, and Se/CS/AMP
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
TEM micrographs of Se NPs; (A), and Se/CS/AMP; (B). Bar scales = 200 nm
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Zeta potential of Se NPs; (A), and Se/CS/AMP; (B)
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Standard curve of AMP in pure water
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Antibacterial activity of Se NPs and Se/CS/AMP, CS, and AMP using agar well diffusion method against B. cereus ATCC 14,579, methicillin-resistant S. aureus ATCC 43,300, K. pneumoniae ATCC 11,296, and P. mirabilis PQ350419
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Agar well diffusion method test of Se NPs and Se/CS/AMP against B. cereus ATCC 14,579; (A), methicillin-resistant S. aureus ATCC 43,300; (B), K. pneumoniae ATCC 11,296; (C), and P. mirabilis PQ350419; (D), in comparison to AMP and CS
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Minimum inhibition concentration of Se NPs; (A), and Se/CS/AMP; (B), against the tested bacteria
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
Minimum bactericidal concentration of Se NPs and Se/CS/AMP against the tested bacteria
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
TEM micrographs showing the antibacterial action of Se NPs; (B), compared to Se/CS/AMP; (C) against P. mirabilis PQ350419. Untreated bacterial cells; (A), displayed normal cell structures. Treated P. mirabilis PQ350419 cells; (B&C), displayed separation between the cell wall (CW) and cytoplasmic membrane (PM); (white arrowhead), vacuole formation; (V), complete cell lysis; (CL), disintegrated cytoplasm (DC), and sever malformation and distortion; (yellow arrows)
Fig. 15
Fig. 15
Antibiofilm potential of Se NPs and Se/CS/AMP in different concentrations (50, 100, and 150 µg/ml) against biofilm-producing bacteria (S. aureus ATCC 43300, K. pneumoniae ATCC 11296, and P. mirabilis PQ350419)
Fig. 16
Fig. 16
The cytotoxic effects of Se NPs and Se/CS/AMP against Vero cell line

Similar articles

References

    1. Amaratunga K, Tarasuk J, Tsegaye L, Archibald CP, Group ARAMRST. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR): advancing surveillance of antimicrobial resistance: summary of the 2015 CIDSC report. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2016;42:232. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baylay AJ, Piddock LJV, Webber MA. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance–Part I. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics–from molecules to man. 2019;1–26.
    1. Li X-Z, Nikaido H. Efflux-mediated drug resistance in bacteria. Drugs. 2009;69:1555–623. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seely SM, Basu RS, Gagnon MG. Mechanistic insights into the alternative ribosome recycling by HflXr. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:4053–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michael CA, Dominey-Howes D, Labbate M. The antimicrobial resistance crisis: causes, consequences, and management. Front Public Health. 2014;2:145. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources