Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;18(9):923-936.
doi: 10.1002/ase.70084. Epub 2025 Jul 6.

Body donation under Italy's recent legal reforms: A cross-sectional study of attitudes, beliefs, and educational gaps among medical students and faculty

Affiliations

Body donation under Italy's recent legal reforms: A cross-sectional study of attitudes, beliefs, and educational gaps among medical students and faculty

Mariangela V Puci et al. Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Postmortem body donation (BD) plays a central role in medical education and scientific research. Sociocultural, religious, and legal factors can influence attitudes toward BD. In Italy, BD programs are in early development, and recent legislation (Law 10/2020) regulating body donation came into effect in 2021. Although international surveys have explored attitudes toward BD, data specific to the Italian context remain limited. This study provides initial insights into attitudes and willingness to donate among medical academics and students at an Italian university. A cross-sectional study was conducted between February and March 2023 using an online questionnaire. The survey collected data on attitudes, dissection experience, sociodemographic, and academic background. A multivariate logistic regression model was implemented to evaluate factors associated with willingness to donate. Of the 2273 individuals invited, 434 completed the questionnaire (19.4% response rate, 70% female, 88% students). Overall, 72.8% were willing to donate. Knowing organ donors was associated with higher willingness, whereas religious beliefs were negatively associated. Only 32% of participants were aware of the national law regulating BD. This study highlights the predominance of positive attitudes toward BD within a healthcare-oriented academic population and the significant influence of religion and personal experience. The limited awareness of Law 10/2020 underscores the need for targeted educational efforts, even within expert communities. These findings support future initiatives aimed at improving awareness, shaping national policy, and contributing to the global discourse on ethical and practical aspects of body donation.

Keywords: Italian anatomy laws; academic survey; anatomical dissection; body donation; medical education; students' attitude.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Percentage distribution of willingness to body donation stratified by sex (A), academic status (B), religious beliefs (C), and dissection course (D).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2. Attitudes toward body donation.
The bar chart displays the distribution of ratings on a 5‐point Likert scale for two distinct groups (reluctance to body donation and willingness to body donation). Each column represents one of the five possible ratings (from Completely disagree to Completely agree), and the different sections within the columns indicate the relative percentages for each of the stratifications considered. Box under graph shows percentage values for each response. The p‐value refers to the comparison between the two groups for each domain analyzed (i.e., BD is an act of charitable, altruism, and solidarity; BD is helpful for advance in medical research; BD is an act of freedom; BD is inappropriate).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3. Multivariate analysis: Factors associated with the willingness to donate one's body.
Forest plot showing the result of multivariate logistic regression analysis. The x‐line represents odds ratio (blue squares) and 95% confidence intervals (whiskers). The red line indicates no effect (p > 0.05).

References

    1. Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem‐based learning medical course? Perceptions of first‐ and second‐year students. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29(2):173–180. - PubMed
    1. Davis CR, Bates AS, Ellis H, Roberts AM. Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(4):262–272. - PubMed
    1. Elizondo‐Omaña RE, Guzmán‐López S, García‐Rodríguez ML. Dissection as a teaching tool: past, present, and future. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005;285(1):11–15. - PubMed
    1. Wilson AB, Miller CH, Klein BA, Taylor MA, Goodwin M, Boyle EK, et al. A meta‐analysis of anatomy laboratory pedagogies. Clin Anat. 2017;31(1):122–133. - PubMed
    1. Arráez‐Aybar LA, Castaño‐Collado G, Casado‐Morales MI. Dissection as a modulator of emotional attitudes and reactions of future health professionals. Med Educ. 2008;42(6):563–571. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03079.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources