Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Aug;13(4):e70147.
doi: 10.1002/prp2.70147.

Aspirin Versus LMWH for Thromboprophylaxis Following Hip or Knee Arthroplasty-Clinical Implications and Budget Impact

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Aspirin Versus LMWH for Thromboprophylaxis Following Hip or Knee Arthroplasty-Clinical Implications and Budget Impact

Eugen Javor et al. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant concern for patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, with a need to balance effective thromboprophylaxis and bleeding risk. We aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and budget impact of aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as sole thromboprophylactic agents initiated immediately postoperatively in this population. First, we conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases, assessing clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. Subsequently, a simplified budget impact analysis was performed using data from the largest identified and most recent RCT (CRISTAL trial) and its secondary analyses. Primary outcomes included symptomatic VTE, bleeding events, and reoperation rates. Through a systematic search, seven RCTs were considered to be eligible, with the CRISTAL trial providing the most compelling evidence. Aspirin was non-inferior to LMWH for all-cause mortality but was associated with a significantly higher symptomatic VTE rate (3,27% vs. 1,76%) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), predominantly distal DVT. The budget impact analysis revealed that despite aspirin's lower per tablet cost, thromboprophylaxis with LMWH led to annual savings of $35,912,459 to $110,431,241 for U.S. healthcare stakeholders, and $17,075 to $56,450 for single hospitals performing 1000 arthroplasty procedures annually. To conclude, enoxaparin appears to offer superior clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness compared to aspirin for thromboprophylaxis following hip and knee arthroplasty. These findings support the preferential use of LMWH in this setting, while highlighting the need for further investigation into the clinical significance of aspirin's higher distal DVT and pulmonary embolism risk.

Keywords: aspirin; low‐molecular‐weight heparin; orthopedics; thromboprophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flow diagram for a systematic review of RCTs that compared aspirin versus LMWH for thromboprophylaxis following hip or knee arthroplasty.

Similar articles

References

    1. Jones A. and Al‐Horani R. A., “Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Major Orthopedic Surgeries and Factor Xia Inhibitors,” Medical Science 11, no. 3 (2023): 49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salazar C. A., Basilio Flores J. E., Malaga G., Malasquez G. N., and Bernardo R., “Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors Versus Low Molecular Weight Heparins or Vitamin K Antagonists for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Elective Primary Hip or Knee Replacement or Hip Fracture Repair,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 27, no. 1 (2025): CD011762. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu J., Chang D., Chui J., Cao J., and Negus J., “The Efficacy and Cost‐Effectiveness of Enoxaparin Versus Rivaroxaban in the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Orthopaedics 30 (2022): 1–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agarwal A. R., Das A., Harris A., et al., “Trends of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: Analysis From 2011 to 2019,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 31 (2023): e376–e384. - PubMed
    1. Mirkazemi C., Bereznicki L. R., and Peterson G. M., “Comparing Australian Orthopaedic Surgeons' Reported Use of Thromboprophylaxis Following Arthroplasty in 2012 and 2017,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 20, no. 1 (2019): 57. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources