Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 4;14(1):387-398.
doi: 10.5334/pme.1658. eCollection 2025.

Learning-by-Concordance Approach in Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Learning-by-Concordance Approach in Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review

Antoine Roche et al. Perspect Med Educ. .

Abstract

Introduction: Learning by concordance (LbC) is an educational approach designed to develop expertise, particularly in the field of clinical reasoning (CR) among healthcare professionals. It is based on the script concordance test (SCT) with the addition of feedback based on expert responses. The objective of this study was to map the scientific literature on this rapidly growing learning approach.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar up to March 10, 2025. Eligible primary studies had to focus on the LbC approach targeting healthcare learners.

Results: Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria: twenty focused on the implementation of the LbC approach and eight on its development. Most of the studies used mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative). The results mainly indicate that learners perceive the LbC approach as engaging and beneficial for decision-making. The articles mention five elements related to the development of LbC that would contribute to its success.

Discussion: The LbC approach could be applicable to a wide range of disciplines and learning levels. The variability in the procedures for developing the approach, as well as the variability of the objectives and methodologies of the studies, limit the comparability of the results.

Conclusion: LbC is a promising approach for promoting decision-making skills in a variety of uncertain clinical contexts. The concept of standardized development and evaluation frameworks for this approach could improve its applicability, effectiveness and reproducibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

References

    1. Helou MA, DiazGranados D, Ryan MS, Cyrus JW. Uncertainty in Decision Making in Medicine: A Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis of Conceptual Models. Acad Med. 2020;95(1):157–65. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002902 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall KH. Reviewing intuitive decision-making and uncertainty: the implications for medical education. Medical education. 2002;36(3):216–24. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01140.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cranley L, Doran DM, Tourangeau AE, Kushniruk A, Nagle L. Nurses’ uncertainty in decision-making: A literature review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2009;6(1):3–15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2008.00138.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhise V, Rajan SS, Sittig DF, Morgan RO, Chaudhary P, Singh H. Defining and Measuring Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(1):103–15. DOI: 10.1111/jan.15414 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith SK, Benbenek MM, Bakker CJ, Bockwoldt D. Scoping review: Diagnostic reasoning as a component of clinical reasoning in the U.S. primary care nurse practitioner education. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(12):3869–96. DOI: 10.1111/jan.15414 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources