Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 23:85:103295.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103295. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Patient -r eported o utcomes (PROs) as personalised cancer care: report from a 2023 Australian consensus meeting (PROActive)

Affiliations
Review

Patient -r eported o utcomes (PROs) as personalised cancer care: report from a 2023 Australian consensus meeting (PROActive)

Carolyn G Mazariego et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

This viewpoint reports on the outcomes of the 2023 Australian interest holder meeting on the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in cancer care and discusses its findings in the context of the significant national investment into the collection of PRO data in Australia. The interest holders emphasised the importance for PRO data collection to be relevant to the care of individual patients and personalised to their needs and preferences to ensure direct impact on patients' care and outcomes. They also prioritised the coordination and integration of various PRO collection efforts to improve patient outcomes and care quality.

Keywords: Cancer care; Digital health; Patient centred care; Patient-reported outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CM received consultancy fees from Movember for contribution to the PanCancer Initiative Advisory Group. SN received consultancy fees from Movember, Mapi Research Trust and Bertelsmann Foundation. SN received grant funding from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Summary of identified priority areas for Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) advocacy and implementation.

Similar articles

References

    1. Girgis A., Durcinoska I., Arnold A., et al. Web-based patient-reported outcome measures for personalized treatment and care (PROMPT-Care): multicenter pragmatic nonrandomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balitsky A.K., Rayner D., Britto J., et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(8):e2424793–e. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basch E., Deal A.M., Dueck A.C., et al. Overall survival results of a trial assessing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during routine cancer treatment. JAMA. 2017;318(2):197–198. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basch E., Deal A.M., Kris M.G., et al. Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):557–565. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caminiti C., Maglietta G., Diodati F., et al. The effects of patient-reported outcome screening on the survival of people with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14(21) - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources