Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 25;3(4):e70035.
doi: 10.1002/cesm.70035. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Creating Interactive Data Dashboards for Evidence Syntheses

Leslie A Perdue  1 , Shaina D Trevino  2 , Sean Grant  2 , Jennifer S Lin  1 , Emily E Tanner-Smith  2
Affiliations

Creating Interactive Data Dashboards for Evidence Syntheses

Leslie A Perdue et al. Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. .

Abstract

Systematic review findings are typically disseminated via static outputs, such as scientific manuscripts, which can limit the accessibility and usability for diverse audiences. Interactive data dashboards transform systematic review data into dynamic, user-friendly visualizations, allowing deeper engagement with evidence synthesis findings. We propose a workflow for creating interactive dashboards to display evidence synthesis results, including three key phases: planning, development, and deployment. Planning involves defining the dashboard objectives and key audiences, selecting the appropriate software (e.g., Tableau or R Shiny) and preparing the data. Development includes designing a user-friendly interface and specifying interactive elements. Lastly, deployment focuses on making it available to users and utilizing user-testing. Throughout all phases, we emphasize seeking and incorporating interest-holder input and aligning dashboards with the intended audience's needs. To demonstrate this workflow, we provide two examples from previous systematic reviews. The first dashboard, created in Tableau, presents findings from a meta-analysis to support a U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation on lipid disorder screening in children, while the second utilizes R Shiny to display data from a scoping review on the 4-day school week among K-12 students in the U.S. Both dashboards incorporate interactive elements to present complex evidence tailored to different interest-holders, including non-research audiences. Interactive dashboards can enhance the utility of evidence syntheses by providing a user-friendly tool for interest-holders to explore data relevant to their specific needs. This workflow can be adapted to create interactive dashboards in flexible formats to increase the use and accessibility of systematic review findings.

Keywords: R; dashboard; evidence synthesis; shiny; tableau.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interactive dashboard displaying the data on the 4‐day school week in the U.S. * The following columns were removed from this screenshot for readability: student race and/or ethnicity, state, fifth day activities, outcome domain, equity domain, and implementation domain.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Yoong S. L., Turon H., Grady A., Hodder R., and Wolfenden L., “The Benefits of Data Sharing and Ensuring Open Sources of Systematic Review Data,” Journal of Public Health 44, no. 4 (2022): e582–e587, 10.1093/pubmed/fdac031. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petkovic J., Welch V., Jacob M. H., et al., “The Effectiveness of Evidence Summaries on Health Policymakers and Health System Managers Use of Evidence From Systematic Reviews: A Systematic Review,” Implementation Science 11, no. 1 (2016): 162, 10.1186/s13012-016-0530-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moat K. A., Lavis J. N., and Abelson J., “How Contexts and Issues Influence the Use of Policy‐Relevant Research Syntheses: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis,” Milbank Quarterly 91, no. 3 (2013): 604–648, 10.1111/1468-0009.12026. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Page M. J., Altman D. G., Shamseer L., et al., “Reproducible Research Practices Are Underused in Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Interventions,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 94 (2018): 8–18, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siette J., Dodds L., Sharifi F., et al., “Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review,” JMIR Aging 6, no. 1 (2023): e42274, 10.2196/42274. - DOI - PMC - PubMed