Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):911-918.
doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.06.012. Epub 2025 Jun 21.

Associations between unilateral-or-bilateral palatal impactions of permanent maxillary canines with dental morphologies, root anatomies, and alveolar measurements

Affiliations

Associations between unilateral-or-bilateral palatal impactions of permanent maxillary canines with dental morphologies, root anatomies, and alveolar measurements

Alireza Jafari-Naeimi et al. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the associations between both unilateral/bilateral palatal impactions of the maxillary canine and a long list of various dentoalveolar anatomical measurements and parameters.

Methods: This case-control study was performed on CBCTs of 3 groups of 23 subjects each (control, unilateral impaction, bilateral impaction, n = 138 hemimaxillae in 69 patients). Examined were the mesiodistal and buccolingual widths of the 1-6 teeth on the right and left sides, all their roots' lengths, maxillary arch widths on the axial plane at the basal bone and the alveolar bone levels, at the distances 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mm from the most anterior point, and maxillary arch circumferences. Moreover, primary canine retention was assessed as well. The groups were compared using chi-square, t-test, ANOVA, and Tukey tests (α = 0.05).

Results: Significant comparisons (P < 0.05) included: At the basal bone level, the arch width of the most anterior section was smaller in the control group compared to the unilateral impaction group only, while interestingly at the alveolar bone level, it was larger in control group compared only to bilateral impaction cases at the most anterior segment. First molar roots were longer in bilateral canine impaction cases compared to control. The buccolingual sizes of premolars/first molar was smaller in control compared to canine impaction. The 5-to-5 arch circumference was smaller in bilateral impaction cases compared the control or unilateral impaction cases (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Several dentoalveolar variables were linked to canine impaction.

Keywords: Anatomy; Oral and maxillofacial surgery; Orthodontics; Palatally impacted canines; Pediatric dentistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An example of measuring the arch width at the basal bone level (left) and at the alveolar bone level (right).

References

    1. Hassan M., Alkhames H.M., Alzouri S.S., Kodali M.V.R.M. A cross-sectional analysis of prevalence of dental anomalies by CBCT images: an institutional-based retrospective study. J Int Oral Health. 2024;16:69–75.
    1. Genc E., Karaman A. Investigation of the relationship between maxillary dimensions and labial and palatal maxillary impacted canines using cone beam computed tomography. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;124 - PubMed
    1. Yassaei S., Safi Y., Valian F., Mohammadi A. Evaluation of maxillary arch width and palatal volume and depth in patients with maxillary impacted canine by CBCT. Heliyon. 2022;8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dadgar S., Alimohamadi M., Rajabi N., Rakhshan V., Sobouti F. Associations among palatal impaction of Canine, sella turcica bridging, and ponticulus posticus (atlas arcuate foramen) Surg Radiol Anat. 2021;43:93–99. - PubMed
    1. Ali B., Shaikh A., Fida M. Association between sella turcica bridging and palatal canine impaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;146:437–441. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources