Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jul 7;51(1):249.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02928-1.

Lag screw versus no lag screw in surgery for Weber B ankle fractures: impact on recovery and surgical outcomes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Lag screw versus no lag screw in surgery for Weber B ankle fractures: impact on recovery and surgical outcomes

Wouter J Joosten et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose: A lag screw is not always used in treating unstable Weber B ankle fractures, and evidence supporting its necessity remains limited. Therefore, recovery and surgical outcomes will be compared between surgery with and without a lag screw in patients with a Weber B ankle fracture.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients with a Weber B fracture who underwent surgery at Máxima Medical Center between 2012 and 2022. Surgery duration, complications, recovery, and reoperation rate and reasons were compared between patients treated with and without a lag screw. A questionnaire, including the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, was sent to the same cohort to assess current ankle functionality and treatment satisfaction.

Results: A total of 302 patients were included, of which 194 with a lag screw. The overall complication rate did not differ (p=0.87), while the distribution of complications did (p=0.01). More wound complications were observed in the no lag screw group (14.8% vs 9.3%), whereas less nerve injuries (0.0% vs 4.6%) and implant complaints (0.9% vs 3.1%) were observed. Surgery duration, recovery, reoperation rate and reasons did not differ between the groups. The questionnaire was completed by 141 patients, of which 92 with a lag screw. Foot and Ankle Outcome subscale scores and treatment satisfaction did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the use of a lag screw is not essential in treating Weber B ankle fractures, as no differences in recovery and surgical outcomes were found between the two groups.

Keywords: Ankle fracture; Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS); Lag screw; Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); Surgery; Weber B.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the retrospective data collection and the additional questionnaire study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores per subscale per group
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Outcome per group for the question ‘Are you currently satisfied with the recovery of your foot/ankle?’

References

    1. Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, McQueen MM, Ricci WM, Tornetta P, McKee MD. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 8th ed. (no. Book, Whole). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2015.
    1. Bergh C, Wennergren D, Möller M, Brisby H. Fracture incidence in adults in relation to age and gender: A study of 27,169 fractures in the Swedish fracture register in a well-defined catchment area. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0244291. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weber BG. Die verletzungen des oberen sprunggelenkes, 2nd ed. (no. Book, Whole). Bern: Huber, 1972.
    1. Briet JP, Hietbrink F, Smeeing DP, Dijkgraaf MGW, Verleisdonk EJ, Houwert RM. Ankle fracture classification: an innovative system for describing ankle fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58(3):492–6. 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.09.028. - PubMed
    1. Mittal R, Harris IA, Adie S, Naylor JM. Surgery for type B ankle fracture treatment: a combined randomised and observational study (CROSSBAT). BMJ Open. 2017;7(3):e013298. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013298. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources