Lag screw versus no lag screw in surgery for Weber B ankle fractures: impact on recovery and surgical outcomes
- PMID: 40622390
- PMCID: PMC12234606
- DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02928-1
Lag screw versus no lag screw in surgery for Weber B ankle fractures: impact on recovery and surgical outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: A lag screw is not always used in treating unstable Weber B ankle fractures, and evidence supporting its necessity remains limited. Therefore, recovery and surgical outcomes will be compared between surgery with and without a lag screw in patients with a Weber B ankle fracture.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients with a Weber B fracture who underwent surgery at Máxima Medical Center between 2012 and 2022. Surgery duration, complications, recovery, and reoperation rate and reasons were compared between patients treated with and without a lag screw. A questionnaire, including the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, was sent to the same cohort to assess current ankle functionality and treatment satisfaction.
Results: A total of 302 patients were included, of which 194 with a lag screw. The overall complication rate did not differ (p=0.87), while the distribution of complications did (p=0.01). More wound complications were observed in the no lag screw group (14.8% vs 9.3%), whereas less nerve injuries (0.0% vs 4.6%) and implant complaints (0.9% vs 3.1%) were observed. Surgery duration, recovery, reoperation rate and reasons did not differ between the groups. The questionnaire was completed by 141 patients, of which 92 with a lag screw. Foot and Ankle Outcome subscale scores and treatment satisfaction did not differ between the groups.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the use of a lag screw is not essential in treating Weber B ankle fractures, as no differences in recovery and surgical outcomes were found between the two groups.
Keywords: Ankle fracture; Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS); Lag screw; Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); Surgery; Weber B.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, McQueen MM, Ricci WM, Tornetta P, McKee MD. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 8th ed. (no. Book, Whole). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2015.
-
- Weber BG. Die verletzungen des oberen sprunggelenkes, 2nd ed. (no. Book, Whole). Bern: Huber, 1972.
-
- Briet JP, Hietbrink F, Smeeing DP, Dijkgraaf MGW, Verleisdonk EJ, Houwert RM. Ankle fracture classification: an innovative system for describing ankle fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58(3):492–6. 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.09.028. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical