Impact of perioperative dexmedetomidine on recurrence and survival outcomes in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
- PMID: 40623770
- PMCID: PMC12258278
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101344
Impact of perioperative dexmedetomidine on recurrence and survival outcomes in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the association between perioperative dexmedetomidine (DEX) use and oncological outcomes-including locoregional recurrence (LRR) and distant metastasis (DM)-in patients undergoing curative surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).
Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database and included patients with stage I-IVB OCSCC who underwent curative surgery between 2007 and 2019. Patients were categorised by DEX exposure status and matched 1:1 using propensity score matching (PSM) based on key clinical and demographic variables. Cox proportional hazards models and competing risk analyses were used to estimate the association between DEX use and oncological outcomes.
Results: After PSM, 8024 patients (4012 per group) were included. Multivariable Cox regression showed that perioperative DEX use was significantly associated with increased risks of LRR (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.67; 95% CI 1.55 to 1.80; p<0.001) and DM (aHR 1.30; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.42; p<0.001).
Discussion: These findings suggest a potential oncological risk associated with perioperative DEX administration. Possible mechanisms include immune modulation and enhanced metastatic potential, as reported in preclinical studies. Further investigation is needed to clarify causal pathways and identify patient subgroups most affected.
Conclusions: Perioperative DEX use is independently associated with increased risks of LRR and DM in OCSCC patients. These results underscore the importance of cautious perioperative management and the need for prospective validation in randomised clinical trials.
Keywords: Databases, Pharmaceutical; Evidence-Based Medicine.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 31;8(8):CD006205. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006205.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37650478 Free PMC article.
-
Sun protection for preventing basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 25;7(7):CD011161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011161.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27455163 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 39051924
-
Tumor Budding as an Independent Prognostic Histopathological Marker in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma - An Indian Tertiary Care Center Experience.Turk Patoloji Derg. 2025;41(2):31-41. doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2025.13761. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2025. PMID: 40091314 Free PMC article.
-
Bioinformatics identification and validation of m6A/m1A/m5C/m7G/ac4 C-modified genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma.BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1055. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14216-7. BMC Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40597017 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous