The clinical application value of the KU-F40 fully automatic fecal analyzer for the detection of fecal parasites: A large-sample retrospective study
- PMID: 40624366
- PMCID: PMC12234752
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-09935-7
The clinical application value of the KU-F40 fully automatic fecal analyzer for the detection of fecal parasites: A large-sample retrospective study
Abstract
Improving the sensitivity of parasite detection is an urgent task for global public health. The traditional manual microscopy method still has some shortcomings in fecal parasite detection. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical application value of the KU-F40 fully automated fecal analyzer in fecal parasite detection by comparing the fecal detection results of the manual microscopy method with those of the KU-F40 instrumental method. Fecal test results were collected from January to June 2023 and January to June 2024, and divided into manual microscopy group (n = 51,627) and KU-F40 instrumental group (n = 50,606) according to methodology. The detection levels and species of parasites detected by the two methods were retrospectively analyzed. The KU-F40 instrumental group had a higher parasite detection level (8.74%) than the manual microscopy group (2.81%), with statistically significant differences between groups (χ2 = 1661.333, P < 0.05). Five species of parasites were detected by the manual microscopy method and nine species of parasites were detected by the KU-F40 instrumental method, of which the detection levels of Clonorchis sinensis eggs, hookworm eggs and Blastocystis hominis were higher than those of the manual microscopy method, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Although the detection levels of tapeworm eggs and Strongyloides stercoralis were also higher than the manual microscopy method, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The KU-F40 fully automatic fecal analyzer has a higher sensitivity to parasite detection and holds significant clinical application value in the detection of fecal parasites. With the combination of manual re-examination, the accuracy of test results can be significantly improved.
Keywords: Clinical application value; Fecal detection; KU-F40 fully automatic fecal analyzer; Manual microscopy; Parasite.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical standards: The research protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (Approval Number: 2024-E0831). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects or their legal guardians.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Evaluation of alarm notification of artificial intelligence in automated analyzer detection of parasites.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 27;103(39):e39788. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039788. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 39331916 Free PMC article.
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Sertindole for schizophrenia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. PMID: 16034864 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35233774 Free PMC article.
-
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29372930 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wenhua, G. & Tingting, Y. Research progress on clinical laboratory examination methods for intestinal parasites. Trace Elem. Health Res.41(5), 83–86 (2024).
-
- Zehong, Q. & Yanqin, W. Comparison of the application of automatic stool analyzer and manual microscopy in fecal specimen detection. Smart Health.8(35), 20–23 (2022).
-
- Hong, S., Yusan, W. & Ziyu, S. National Clinical Laboratory Testing Procedures. 4th Edition. Beijing: People’s Health Publishing House pp.175–177 (2015).
-
- Król, G. et al. Toxicity of parasites and their unconventional use in medicine. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med.26(4), 523–531. 10.26444/aaem/109665 (2019). - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical