Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 7;19(1):360.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02488-x.

Bowel function and quality of life after robotic and laparoscopic IPAA: a patient-reported outcomes study

Tommaso Violante  1   2 , Davide Ferrari  1   3 , Nicholas P McKenna  1 , William R G Perry  1 , Eric J Dozois  1 , Kevin T Behm  1 , Kellie L Mathis  1 , David W Larson  4
Affiliations

Bowel function and quality of life after robotic and laparoscopic IPAA: a patient-reported outcomes study

Tommaso Violante et al. J Robot Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis, offering numerous benefits over open surgery. However, the impact of robotic surgery on long-term quality of life (QoL) remains poorly defined.

Objective: To analyze QoL after robotic and laparoscopic IPAA using a validated patient-reported outcome instrument.

Design: This retrospective, STROBE-compliant study analyzed 158 patients who underwent laparoscopic (n = 112) or robotic (n = 46) IPAA at a single, tertiary-care institution.

Settings: Data were collected at a single, tertiary-care institution.

Patients: The study included 158 patients who underwent laparoscopic (n = 112) or robotic (n = 46) IPAA. All patients had a J-pouch procedure and had at least 12 months of restored intestinal continuity.

Interventions: Laparoscopic or robotic IPAA.

Main outcome measures: QoL was assessed using a modified, validated Ileoanal Pouch Syndrome Severity Score (IPSS) survey at least 12 months after ileostomy closure.

Results: Both groups experienced similar overall QoL, with a high prevalence of severe or extremely severe pouch-related symptoms (55.1%). Robotic IPAA was associated with longer operative times but less blood loss. Worse IPSS scores correlated with hand-sewn IPAA with mucosectomy and postoperative septic complications. Despite these challenges, 92% of patients preferred IPAA over ileostomy.

Limitations: Retrospective design and potential for non-response bias. The modified IPSS survey may not fully capture all aspects of QoL.

Conclusions: In this cohort, robotic and laparoscopic IPAA resulted in comparable QoL as measured by a validated patient-reported outcome instrument. Significant pouch dysfunction remains prevalent regardless of surgical approach. Modifiable factors, such as hand-sewn anastomosis and septic complications, negatively impact patient-reported outcomes.

Keywords: IBD; IPAA; Minimally invasive; Quality of life; Robotic; Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Ng KS, Gonsalves SJ, Sagar PM (2019) Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol 25(31):4320–4342 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Holubar SD, Lightner AL, Poylin V, Vogel JD, Gaertner W, Davis B et al (2021) The American Society of colon and rectal surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the surgical management of ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 64(7):783–804 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Violante T, Ferrari D, Gomaa IA, Rumer KK, D’Angelo AD, Behm KT et al (2024) Evolution of laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: impact of enhanced recovery program, medication changes, and staged approaches on outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 28(4):501–506 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nyam DC, Brillant PT, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG (1997) Ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: early and late results. Ann Surg. 226(4):514–519 (discussion 9-21) - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Herzig D, Hardiman K, Weiser M, You N, Paquette I, Feingold DL, Steele SR (2017) The American Society of colon and rectal surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the management of inherited polyposis syndromes. Dis Colon Rectum 60(9):881–894 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources