Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):2399.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22233-1.

Theater testing a sexual and reproductive health program for Latina teens and their female caregivers: a mixed methods study

Affiliations

Theater testing a sexual and reproductive health program for Latina teens and their female caregivers: a mixed methods study

Katherine G Merrill et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Floreciendo is a sexual and reproductive health program for Latina teens (14-18 years) and their female caregivers adapted from the evidence-based IMARA intervention. We report on our experience theater testing Floreciendo during the preparation phase of the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework. Floreciendo includes four two-hour sessions (i.e., intervention components). Our aims were to: (1) examine the preliminary acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the intervention components, including the acceptability of the implementation plan (i.e., logistics, strategies), and (2) systematically report on curriculum modifications made based on findings.

Methods: Using a community-based participatory research approach, we theater tested the program at a community organization over one weekend with three teen-caregiver dyads (n = 6) using mixed methods. Immediately following the delivery of each intervention component, teens and caregivers completed surveys and engaged in feedback sessions. Observers (n = 8) and facilitators (n = 2) completed surveys, recorded activity start and end times, and participated in a post-program discussion. Survey item ratings were on four-point Likert scales, with higher scores indicating more favorable results. Feedback informed subsequent curriculum modifications, which were documented using the FRAME.

Results: We found high satisfaction with the intervention components among all surveyed (n = 16) and with the implementation plan among teens and caregivers (n = 6) (≥ 3.7/4.0). Teens and caregivers described sessions as "educational," "motivating," "interactive," and "fun"; all (100%; n = 6) reported that they would recommend the program to others. Teens and caregivers rated the appropriateness of the material and language/wording highly (4.0/4.0; n = 6), although caregivers expressed difficulty understanding "passive communication" given translation difficulties. Feasibility was also rated highly across groups (≥ 3.8/4.0; n = 16); 18% of activities were 10 + minutes longer than planned based on observer reports but the sessions overall remained within 2 min of the allotted time. We modified the intervention components based on the feedback received. For example, we moved discussions about sex to come later in the foundational session to increase participant comfort.

Conclusions: Findings offer preliminary evidence of Floreciendo's acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Theater testing is a valuable tool for intervention adaptation and FRAME is useful for tracking curriculum modifications over time. MOST researchers could consider theater testing while carrying out preparation-phase activities.

Keywords: Adolescent sexual and reproductive health; Community-based participatory research; Intervention adaptation; Latina adolescent; Theater testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, informed consent and parental permission for minors was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional review board at the University of Illinois Chicago (IRB 00000116). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baumann A, Cabassa L, Stirman S. Adaptation in dissemination and implementation science. Dissemination Implement Res Health: Translating Sci Pract. 2017;2:286–300.
    1. Cabassa LJ, Baumann AA. A two-way street: bridging implementation science and cultural adaptations of mental health treatments. Implement Sci. 2013;8:1–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Escoffrey C, Lebow-Skelley D, Haardoerfer R, Boing E, Udelson H, Wood R, et al. A systematic review of adaptations of evidence-based public health interventions globally. Implement Sci. 2018;13:125. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirchner JE, Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Smith JL, Proctor EK. Implementation strategies. Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice. 2018;2.
    1. Stirman S, Baumann A, Miller C. The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2019;14:58. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources