Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;26(3):92-101.
doi: 10.7181/acfs.2024.0093. Epub 2025 Jun 20.

Assessment of upper airway and temporomandibular joint changes in growing patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion, treated with the Twin Block appliance: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study

Affiliations

Assessment of upper airway and temporomandibular joint changes in growing patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion, treated with the Twin Block appliance: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study

Ioannis Anagnostopoulos et al. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The Twin Block (TWB) appliance is widely employed for treating Class II malocclusion in children and adolescents. This study aimed to evaluate the three-dimensional treatment effects of the TWB on the upper airway and temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and to investigate the association between airway changes and TMJ alterations.

Methods: This retrospective study examined 24 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans from 12 patients (mean age, 12.30 ± 1.24 years) diagnosed with Class II Division 1 malocclusion and treated with the TWB appliance. CBCT scans were acquired both at pretreatment (T0) and posttreatment (T1). Romexis 6.2.1 imaging software was used to assess changes in the upper airway and TMJ. The paired t-test was used to compare the pretreatment and posttreatment measurements, while Pearson correlation coefficient analysis evaluated the relationship between the upper airway and TMJ measurements.

Results: A statistically significant increase was observed in the upper airway volume, condylar volume, and condylar dimensions after treatment. No significant correlation was detected between the upper airway and TMJ measurements at T0, T1, or in the net changes (T1-T0) during TWB therapy.

Conclusion: Growing patients treated with the TWB appliance demonstrated a statistically significant increase in upper airway volume. In addition, there was a significant increase in condylar volume, width, and length, with the condyle repositioned more anteriorly within the glenoid fossa. However, no statistically significant correlation was found between the TMJ and upper airway measurements.

Keywords: Adolescent; Cone-beam computed tomography; Functional orthodontic appliance; Malocclusion; Mandible; Temporomandibular joint.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Twin Block appliance used in the study.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Colored area: outline of the upper airway space.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cross-sectional measurements of the airway. (A) Upper airway segmentation following the curvature of the upper airway. (B) Axial line perpendicular to the midline of the airway curvature used in cross-sectional measurements.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Measurement of the anterior joint space (AJS) and posterior joint space (PJS). A tangent line is drawn from the most superior point of the glenoid fossa (point S) to the most anterior (point A) and most posterior (point B) parts of the condyle. The shortest distances from the anterior and posterior tangent points to the glenoid fossa were the AJS and PJS, respectively.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Linear condylar measurements. (A) Condylar width measurement: linear distance between the most medial (MCo) and the most lateral point of the condyle (LCo), (B) condylar length measurement: linear distance between the most anterior (ACo) and most posterior point of the condyle (PCo), (C) intercondylar width measurement (CoR-CoL): distance between the most lateral point of the left and the right condyle.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ghafari JG, Macari AT. Component analysis of Class II, Division 1 discloses limitations for transfer to Class I phenotype. Semin Orthod. 2014;20:253–71.
    1. Bishara SE. Class II malocclusions: diagnostic and clinical considerations with and without treatment. Semin Orthod. 2006;12:11–24.
    1. Clark WJ. The Twin Block traction technique. Eur J Orthod. 1982;4:129–38. - PubMed
    1. Bjork A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42:400–11. - PubMed
    1. Koretsi V, Zymperdikas VF, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37:418–34. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources