Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 23:13:1620652.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1620652. eCollection 2025.

The ever-evolving world of microbes: the current state of microbial taxonomy, genome evolutionary dynamics, and the potential impact on the future of agricultural microbials risk assessment

Affiliations
Review

The ever-evolving world of microbes: the current state of microbial taxonomy, genome evolutionary dynamics, and the potential impact on the future of agricultural microbials risk assessment

Katherine A Karberg. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Risk assessment frameworks for plant agricultural biotechnology products have been in place for decades, focused on the evaluation of living biotechnology products created through genetic engineering. These products contain genetic material from outside the breeder's gene pool, which is often from different taxa or represents "novel combinations of genetic material". These products are typically considered to be "genetically modified" (GM) organisms in regulatory jurisdictions. However, in the microbial world, particularly among Bacteria and Archaea, the rapid expansion of genome sequence databases shows that natural microbial innovation primarily occurs through the natural exchange of genetic material from various sources, even from different taxa. This means that many microbes can be considered naturally occurring GM organisms. This raises the question of whether labeling a microbe as GM is always scientifically relevant for risk assessment. In most regulatory frameworks, being classified as GM significantly impacts the registration path, especially for microbes intended for environmental release. A more effective and science-based regulatory approach would assess the actual functions of a microbe rather than relying on the uncertain classification of its genetic material. This would benefit regulators, developers, and society by promoting the use of microbial technologies for agricultural use.

Keywords: agricultural biologicals; biosafety; horitzontal gene trasfer; microbial genome evolution; microbial taxonomy; pangenome; regulation; risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author KK is an employee of Bayer Crop Science, a manufacturer of crop protection products including microbial biologicals.

Similar articles

References

    1. Arnold B. J., Huang I.-T., Hanage W. P. (2022). Horizontal gene transfer and adaptive evolution in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20 (4), 206–218. 10.1038/s41579-021-00650-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Batista B. D., Singh B. K. (2021). Realities and hopes in the application of microbial tools in agriculture. Microb. Biotechnol. 14 (4), 1258–1268. 10.1111/1751-7915.13866 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brenner D. J. (1973). Deoxyribonucleic acid reassociation in the taxonomy of enteric bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 23 (4), 298–307. 10.1099/00207713-23-4-298 - DOI
    1. Brito I. L. (2021). Examining horizontal gene transfer in microbial communities. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19 (7), 442–453. 10.1038/s41579-021-00534-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chemla Y., Sweeney C. J., Wozniak C. A., Voigt C. A. (2025). Design and regulation of engineered bacteria for environmental release. Nat. Microbiol. 10 (2), 281–300. 10.1038/s41564-024-01918-0 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources