Evaluation of an intervention limiting food industry influence on public food policy processes in Ghana
- PMID: 40626460
- PMCID: PMC12235507
- DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daaf081
Evaluation of an intervention limiting food industry influence on public food policy processes in Ghana
Abstract
This study evaluates the immediate effect of an educational intervention implemented among key policy actors in Ghana. The intervention focused on creating awareness and increasing competencies for countering food industry public food policy dilution strategies. The intervention was evaluated using a before-and-after design, collecting self-reported awareness, appropriateness, competencies, and skill level rating, and using frequencies, percentages, and non-parametric testing (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, with alpha set at 0.05) to report results. Thirty policy actors attended the workshop, but 23 and 17 participated in the evaluation (pre- and post-workshop, respectively). Most (82%) were health experts, with about 48% reporting two decades or more of professional experience. Before the intervention, policy actors reported receiving job offers, promotional material, and sponsored travel from the food industry. After the workshop, policy actors' overall mean appropriateness level rating of such strategies decreased (from 2.60 ± 0.87 to 1.95 ± 0.81; P = 0.013). Policy actors' overall awareness level rating of food industry using such strategies to influence public food policies increased after the workshop (from 4.27 ± 0.55 to 4.38 ± 0.59; P = 0.657). Similarly, their overall mean competencies and skill level rating for recognizing and countering public food policy dilution strategies increased (from 2.70 ± 0.54 to 3.13 ± 0.41; P = 0.012). The findings show the potential of an educational workshop serving as a preemptive intervention to protect public food policies from industry influence, and for such interventions to be incorporated into national food policy development processes.
Keywords: Ghana; awareness raising; conflict of interest; corporate political activity; policy bundle.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicting interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27040721 Free PMC article.
-
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280. Health Technol Assess. 2008. PMID: 18547499
-
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 39051924
-
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897. Med Teach. 2009. PMID: 19404891
-
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4(4):CD009794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009794.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27128768 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991;50:179–211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t - DOI
-
- Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior: frequently asked questions. Hum Behav Emerg Technol 2020;2:314–24. 10.1002/hbe2.195 - DOI
-
- Bell S, Hindmoor A, Umashev N. The determinants of corporate political activity in Australia. Aust J Polit Sci 2023;58:363–82. 10.1080/10361146.2023.2231893 - DOI
-
- Bellis L, Miah W, Beyer JA. Ten simple rules for measuring the impact of workshops. PLOS Comput Biol 2018;14. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006191. https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1... - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources