Management of metastatic uveal melanoma: French expert consensus guidelines
- PMID: 40628555
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2025.05.011
Management of metastatic uveal melanoma: French expert consensus guidelines
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare malignancy originating from uveal melanocytes. Despite effective control of the primary tumour, metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) occurs in approximately 20-30% of patients, primarily affecting the liver, with a poor prognosis and overall survival (OS). The unique molecular profile of UM, lacking BRAF, NRAS, and KIT mutations, limits targeted therapy efficacy. Chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) also show limited benefits, while tebentafusp has emerged as the first drug to improve OS, but this systemic treatment can be used only in HLA-A*02:01-positive patients. A French multidisciplinary panel developed evidence-based guidelines for MUM management presented in this review. Recommendations emphasise on comprehensive diagnosis, including liver biopsy and imaging, circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) analysis, and high-definition HLA typing for HLA-A*02:01. Local therapies are proposed for patients with limited hepatic metastases, from liver surgery to isolated hepatic perfusion and chemoembolisation for patients with more extensive hepatic involvement. Systemic therapy with tebentafusp is the standard of care for HLA-A*02:01-positive patients. For HLA-A*02:01-negative patients with extensive disease, treatment options are limited. They are encouraged to participate in a clinical trial, alternatively, percutaneous hepatic perfusion, ICI alone or in combination can be proposed. Treatment efficacy assessment includes response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST), tumour growth rate (TGR) analysis, and ctDNA dynamics. This consensus provides practical guidelines for French oncologists to optimise MUM management, integrating locoregional interventions, systemic therapies, and biomarkers to enhance patient outcomes.
Keywords: Circulating tumour DNA; Immune checkpoint inhibitor; Local treatments; Metastatic uveal melanoma; Tebentafusp; Tumour growth rate.
Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure of interest The authors declare the following financial interests, that could be considered as potential competing interests: Manuel Rodrigues reports personal fees for serving as an advisor from Abbvie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, speakers's bureau for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunocore; travel support from Immunocore; and funds to his institution to support research from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen-Cilag, and Daiichi-Sankyo. Marc Pracht reports grants or contracts from Immunocore, BMS, MSD; consulting fees from BMS; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Immunocore, MSD, BMS; support for attending meetings and/or travel by Immunocore and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Immunocore and BMS. Caroline Dutriaux served as principal investigator in trials evaluating tebentafusp in cutaneous melanomas. Agnès Ducoulombier reports personal fees for serving as an advisor from Deciphera, travel support from Merck Sharp &Dohme, PharmaMar, Gilead, and funds to her institution to support research from Merck Sharp & Dohme. Sophie Piperno-Neumann received consulting fees by Immunocore, support for attending meetings and/or travel by Novartis, Deciphera, Pharmamar, took part on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Immunocore, Deciphera, Replimune. All of the authors participated in the expert advisory board organised by Immunocore Ltd in August 2024, and have received either personally or on behalf of their institution, a remuneration for their contribution to the board.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous