Optimizing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the S-O Clip's Impact on Procedural Outcomes and Lesion-Specific Applications
- PMID: 40629231
- DOI: 10.1007/s10620-025-09204-7
Optimizing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the S-O Clip's Impact on Procedural Outcomes and Lesion-Specific Applications
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive procedure used to treat early-stage gastrointestinal neoplasms. While effective, ESD can be technically challenging due to limited submucosal visibility, prolonged procedure time, and increased risk of adverse events such as perforation and bleeding. The S-O clip, a traction device designed to enhance submucosal exposure, may help overcome these limitations and improve procedural outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing ESD with and without the S-O clip in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Primary outcomes included en-bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, and procedure time. Secondary outcomes were dissection speed and adverse events, including intraoperative perforation and post-ESD bleeding. Pooled relative risks (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on lesion location.
Results: Seventeen studies involving 1,449 patients were included. Use of the S-O clip significantly reduced procedure time (MD: - 19.63 min, 95% CI: - 28.02 to - 11.23, P < 0.001) and increased en-bloc resection rate (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09, P = 0.01). Complete resection rates were similar between groups (RR: 1.03, P = 0.23). Dissection speed was significantly higher with the S-O clip (MD: 10.18 mm2/min, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in intraoperative perforation or post-ESD bleeding rates.
Conclusions: The S-O clip is a useful adjunct in ESD, improving efficiency and en-bloc resection without increasing adverse events. Its use may enhance outcomes, particularly in gastric and colorectal ESD.
Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Gastrointestinal neoplasms; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Surgical clips; Treatment outcome.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
The Impact of Traction Methods on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Efficacy for Gastric Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Mar;55(1):129-142. doi: 10.1007/s12029-023-00982-9. Epub 2023 Nov 13. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024. PMID: 37953438
-
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection with Rubber Bands and Clips Compared to Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Aug;70(8):2823-2833. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09074-z. Epub 2025 May 3. Dig Dis Sci. 2025. PMID: 40319201 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis.Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2666-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1627-z. Epub 2011 Mar 18. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 21424201
-
Planned use of a novel Elastic Traction Device improves efficiency in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity-score matched study.Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul;39(7):4641-4651. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11807-0. Epub 2025 May 29. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40442356 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection vs conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal neoplasms: a single-centre retrospective study.Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Apr;27(4):317-323. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02732-8. Epub 2022 Nov 17. Tech Coloproctol. 2023. PMID: 36394695
Cited by
-
Nutritional Vulnerability After Bariatric Surgery in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Call for Vigilance.Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09202-9. Online ahead of print. Dig Dis Sci. 2025. PMID: 40676378 No abstract available.
References
-
- Draganov PV. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for colon polyps. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2018;14:50.
-
- Kandel P, Wallace MB. Colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 2017;31:455–471. - DOI
-
- Sakamoto N, Osada T, Shibuya T, Beppu K, Matsumoto K, Mori H et al. Combination of a new traction device “S-O Clip” and Mantishook-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2008;67:AB138. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous