Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 8.
doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09204-7. Online ahead of print.

Optimizing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the S-O Clip's Impact on Procedural Outcomes and Lesion-Specific Applications

Affiliations

Optimizing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the S-O Clip's Impact on Procedural Outcomes and Lesion-Specific Applications

Fariha Hasan et al. Dig Dis Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive procedure used to treat early-stage gastrointestinal neoplasms. While effective, ESD can be technically challenging due to limited submucosal visibility, prolonged procedure time, and increased risk of adverse events such as perforation and bleeding. The S-O clip, a traction device designed to enhance submucosal exposure, may help overcome these limitations and improve procedural outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing ESD with and without the S-O clip in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Primary outcomes included en-bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, and procedure time. Secondary outcomes were dissection speed and adverse events, including intraoperative perforation and post-ESD bleeding. Pooled relative risks (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on lesion location.

Results: Seventeen studies involving 1,449 patients were included. Use of the S-O clip significantly reduced procedure time (MD: - 19.63 min, 95% CI: - 28.02 to - 11.23, P < 0.001) and increased en-bloc resection rate (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09, P = 0.01). Complete resection rates were similar between groups (RR: 1.03, P = 0.23). Dissection speed was significantly higher with the S-O clip (MD: 10.18 mm2/min, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in intraoperative perforation or post-ESD bleeding rates.

Conclusions: The S-O clip is a useful adjunct in ESD, improving efficiency and en-bloc resection without increasing adverse events. Its use may enhance outcomes, particularly in gastric and colorectal ESD.

Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Gastrointestinal neoplasms; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Surgical clips; Treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ikeda K, Nishiyama H et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study. Gut. 2009;58:331–336. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Draganov PV. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for colon polyps. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2018;14:50.
    1. Kandel P, Wallace MB. Colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 2017;31:455–471. - DOI
    1. Sekra A, Yozu M. Traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of a gastric subepithelial tumor: a case report. Cureus. 2024;16:e63649. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Sakamoto N, Osada T, Shibuya T, Beppu K, Matsumoto K, Mori H et al. Combination of a new traction device “S-O Clip” and Mantishook-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2008;67:AB138. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources