Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine: a consensus of 22
- PMID: 40629428
- PMCID: PMC12239397
- DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05532-2
Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine: a consensus of 22
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the landscape of critical care, offering opportunities for enhanced diagnostic precision and personalized patient management. However, its integration into ICU clinical practice presents significant challenges related to equity, transparency, and the patient-clinician relationship. To address these concerns, a multidisciplinary team of experts was established to assess the current state and future trajectory of AI in critical care. This consensus identified key challenges and proposed actionable recommendations to guide AI implementation in this high-stakes field. Here we present a call to action for the critical care community, to bridge the gap between AI advancements and the need for humanized, patient-centred care. Our goal is to ensure a smooth transition to personalized medicine while, (1) maintaining equitable and unbiased decision-making, (2) fostering the development of a collaborative research network across ICUs, emergency departments, and operating rooms to promote data sharing and harmonization, and (3) addressing the necessary educational and regulatory shifts required for responsible AI deployment. AI integration into critical care demands coordinated efforts among clinicians, patients, industry leaders, and regulators to ensure patient safety and maximize societal benefit. The recommendations outlined here provide a foundation for the ethical and effective implementation of AI in critical care medicine.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Critical care medicine; Ethics; Healthcare innovation; Personalized medicine.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: All authors consent to this publication. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Toward a responsible future: recommendations for AI-enabled clinical decision support.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):2730-2739. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae209. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024. PMID: 39325508 Free PMC article.
-
Recommendations for Clinicians, Technologists, and Healthcare Organizations on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Position Statement from the Society of General Internal Medicine.J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(3):694-702. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09102-0. Epub 2024 Nov 12. J Gen Intern Med. 2025. PMID: 39531100 Free PMC article.
-
Redefining Mentorship in Medical Education with Artificial Intelligence: A Delphi Study on the Feasibility and Implications.Teach Learn Med. 2025 Jun 18:1-11. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2025.2521001. Online ahead of print. Teach Learn Med. 2025. PMID: 40534163
-
Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis.Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116357. Epub 2023 Nov 4. Soc Sci Med. 2023. PMID: 37949020
-
The combined impact of AI and VR on interdisciplinary learning and patient safety in healthcare education: a narrative review.BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):1039. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07589-7. BMC Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 40646457 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25:44–56. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous