Identification and validation of clinical phenotypes in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection and their association with mortality (FEN-AUREUS study)
- PMID: 40630616
- PMCID: PMC12235390
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103240
Identification and validation of clinical phenotypes in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection and their association with mortality (FEN-AUREUS study)
Abstract
Background: Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is heterogeneous in patients and infection-related features. The aim of the study was to identify clinical phenotypes among patients with SAB, to evaluate their association with mortality, and to derive and validate a simplified probabilistic model for phenotypes assignment.
Methods: Phenotypes were derived using two-stage cluster analysis of 2128 patients from the ISAC cohort (recruited between 2013 and 2015), analysing 62 variables. Cox regression assessed phenotype-mortality associations. Logistic regression was employed to develop a simplified probabilistic model for sub-phenotype allocation, validated in two external international cohorts: INSTINCT (1217 patients, recruited between 2006 and 2011) and FEN-AUREUS (1185 patients, recruited between January 2021 and October 2024). The association between sub-phenotypes and 30-day mortality in the validation cohorts was also assessed.
Findings: Cluster analysis identified three clinical phenotypes based on the probable portal of entry: A (skin and soft tissues), 458 cases; B (vascular device-associated), 573 cases; and C (other portals of entry or unknown), 1097 cases. Their 30-day mortality was significantly different (13·1%, 18·2% and 25·3%, respectively, p < 0·001). Each phenotype contained two sub-phenotypes with differing characteristics and mortality risks. Also, three phenotypes were found in the INSTINCT cohort, which clustered on the same portals of entry, with two sub-phenotypes in each. When the simplified probabilistic model was applied, the sub-phenotypes showed significant associations with 30-day mortality in both validation cohorts. In INSTINCT, the aHRs were 1·93 (A2 vs A1), 3·40 (B2 vs B1), and 3·04 (C2 vs C1). In FEN-AUREUS, the aHRs were 2·02 (A2 vs A1), 2·11 (B2 vs B1), and 2·44 (C2 vs C1).
Interpretation: Patients with SAB can be classified into phenotypes and sub-phenotypes, each exhibiting considerable variations in mortality rates. To facilitate clinical application, a validated open-access algorithm and calculator for phenotype and sub-phenotype assignment have been developed, enabling their use at the time of SAB confirmation. This tool aims to support timely and personalised patient care.
Funding: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (PI21/01801).
Keywords: Bacteraemia; Clinical profiles; Mortality; Phenotypes; Staphylococcus aureus.
© 2025 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
Daniel Hornuss reports honoraria from Pfizer, Streamed Up, and Thieme Publications. Siegbert Rieg reports honoraria for lectures from Falk Foundation, Pfizer, bioMérieux, and other medical education providers, including Akademie für Infektionsmedizin, Med Update GmbH, streamedup! GmbH, Deutsches Beratungszentrum für Hygiene, Deutscher Apotheker-Verlag, Forum für medizinische Fortbildung, and Meet The Experts Academy. Esperanza Merino de Lucas reports grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III; honoraria for lectures from MSD, Tillots, Gilead, Menarini, AstraZeneca, and Angelini; support for travel from MSD and Gilead; and participation on advisory boards for Tillots and Advanz Pharma. Antonio Plata-Ciézar reports honoraria from Menarini, Pfizer, and Shionogi, and participation on advisory boards for Shionogi and Menarini. Luis Eduardo López-Cortés reports consulting fees from Angelini (scientific advisor), and honoraria for lectures from Angelini, ViiV, Gilead, and Correvio. All other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Figures



References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous