Transoral Submandibular Gland Excisions: Avoiding the Unsightly Neck Scar in Select Patient Populations
- PMID: 40631466
- DOI: 10.1002/hed.28242
Transoral Submandibular Gland Excisions: Avoiding the Unsightly Neck Scar in Select Patient Populations
Abstract
Background: Submandibular gland (SMG) excision is traditionally performed using a transcervical approach, which, although effective, carries risks such as visible neck scarring and nerve complications. The transoral approach presents a cosmetically favorable alternative, yet its adoption remains limited. This case series was done to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and complication profile of the transoral approach for SMG excision in patients with benign pathologies.
Methods: This retrospective case series was conducted at a single tertiary-care institution and included 30 patients who underwent transoral SMG excision between the ages of 7 and 80 years, performed by a single surgeon. Patients included in the case series had benign conditions such as chronic sialadenitis, ranulas, and a pleomorphic adenoma. Outcomes of interest included conversion to open surgery, avoidance of cervical scarring, intraoperative duration, and postoperative complications.
Results: All 30 patients avoided a transcervical incision and no conversions to an open approach occurred. The average operative time was 95 min, transient tongue paresthesias occurred in three patients, resolving within 6 weeks. No cases of hypoglossal or marginal mandibular nerve injury were observed. Two postoperative infections were recorded, one of which required hospitalization and intravenous antibiotics. No hematomas or seromas were identified.
Conclusion: The transoral approach for SMG excision is a viable, cosmetically favorable alternative for select patients with benign glandular disease.
Keywords: cosmetic approach to SMG excision; scar reduction; submandibular gland excision; transoral surgical approach.
© 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
-
- G. Cammaroto, C. Vicini, F. Montevecchi, et al., “Submandibular Gland Excision: From External Surgery to Robotic Intraoral and Extraoral Approaches,” Oral Diseases 26, no. 5 (2020): 853–857, https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13340.
-
- D. D. Beahm, L. Peleaz, D. W. Nuss, et al., “Surgical Approaches to the Submandibular Gland: A Review of Literature,” International Journal of Surgery 7, no. 6 (2009): 503–509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.09.006.
-
- Y. H. Goh and D. S. Sethi, “Submandibular Gland Excision: A Five‐Year Review,” Journal of Laryngology and Otology 112, no. 3 (1998): 269–273, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100158323.
-
- K. H. Hong and Y. K. Kim, “Intraoral Removal of the Submandibular Gland: A New Surgical Approach,” Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 122, no. 6 (2000): 798–802, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194‐59980070004‐0.
-
- S. M. Weber, M. K. Wax, and J. H. Kim, “Transoral Excision of the Submandibular Gland,” Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 137, no. 2 (2007): 343–345, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2007.04.025.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources