Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Jul 15;131(14):e35927.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.35927.

Talquetamab improves patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: Results from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Talquetamab improves patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: Results from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study

Carolina Schinke et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Talquetamab is the first approved G protein-coupled receptor family C group 5 member D-targeting bispecific antibody for the treatment of triple-class exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) on the basis of results from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT03399799 and NCT04634552). This study describes patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients who received talquetamab in MonumenTAL-1.

Methods: PROs were assessed in phase 2 of MonumenTAL-1. Patients had RRMM with ≥3 prior lines of therapy (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and anti-CD38 antibodies). Patients included in these analyses received talquetamab 0.8 mg/kg every other week. PRO assessments included European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS), and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS).

Results: As of January 29, 2024, PRO data were available for 118 patients who received ≥1 dose of talquetamab. Compliance for completion was >95% of patients at baseline and >80% at most posttreatment visits. After an initial worsening in most PROs from baseline through cycle 1, patients reported improvements with continued treatment. At cycle 21, least-squares mean change from baseline showed improvements in global health status (4.9 points) and emotional functioning (12.5 points), along with reductions in pain (11.4 points) and fatigue (4.0 points). The proportion of patients with clinically meaningful improvements or no change from baseline increased throughout treatment. EQ-5D-5L VAS and PGIS scores demonstrated improvement in health-related quality of life.

Conclusions: These PRO results complement the efficacy and safety profile of talquetamab, which highlights talquetamab as a viable treatment option for patients with triple-class exposed RRMM.

Keywords: bispecific antibody; health‐related quality of life; multiple myeloma; patient‐reported outcome measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Carolina Schinke has received honoraria from Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer, and has participated in advisory board meetings for Arcellx, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer. Cyrille Touzeau has received honoraria from Bristol‐Myers Squibb (BMS) and Janssen Biotech, and serves as a member on the board of directors or advisory committee for BMS. Albert Oriol has received honoraria from Amgen, BMS, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Janssen Biotech, Johnson & Johnson, Menarini, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, and Sanofi, and serves as a member on the board of directors or advisory committee for BMS, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Menarini, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, and Sanofi. María‐Victoria Mateos has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Kite Pharma, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Stemline, and Takeda; is a member of a board of directors or advisory committee for AbbVie, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen Global Services, Johnson & Johnson, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Sanofi, Stemline, and Takeda; and is a speakers’ bureau member for Johnson & Johnson. Leo Rasche has received honoraria from BMS, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; is a member of a board of directors or advisory committee for Amgen, BMS, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, and Sanofi; is a consultant for Amgen, BMS, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has received travel support from BeiGene and Johnson & Johnson; and has received research funding from BMS, GSK, Sanofi, and SkylineDx. Xiang Qin, Kelly Kato, Sacheeta Bathija, Eva G. Katz, Katharine S. Gries, Michela Campagna, Tara Masterson, Brandi W. Hilder, Jaszianne Tolbert, Thomas Renaud, Christoph Heuck, and Chalmer Tomlinson are employees of Johnson & Johnson and may hold stock, stock options, or equity in Johnson & Johnson. Philippe Moreau has received honoraria from and is a member of an advisory board for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen Biotech, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda. Jesús San‐Miguel is a consultant and advisory board member for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, HaemaLogiX, Johnson & Johnson, Karyopharm, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Secura Bio, and Takeda. Paula Rodríguez‐Otero is a consultant for AbbVie, BMS, H3 Biomedicine, Janssen Global Services, Pfizer, Roche, and Stemline; is a member of a board of directors or advisory committee for AbbVie, BMS, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Kite Pharma, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda; and has received honoraria from Amgen, BMS, GSK, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda. Ajai Chari is a consultant for Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Antengene, BMS, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Millenium/Takeda, and Secura Bio; is a member of an advisory board for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Genentech, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Karyopharm, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Secura Bio, and Shattuck Labs; and has received research funding from Amgen, BMS, Johnson & Johnson, Millenium/Takeda, and Seattle Genetics. The other author declares no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Baseline EORTC QLQ‐C30 and EQ‐5D‐5L VAS scores. EORTC QLQ‐C30 and EQ‐5D‐5L VAS scores range from 0 to 100. EORTC QLQ‐C30 indicates European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30; EQ‐5D‐5L VAS, EuroQol 5‐Dimension 5‐Level Visual Analogue Scale; GHS, global health status; HRQOL, health‐related quality of life; Q2W, every other week.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Least‐squares mean changes from baseline EORTC QLQ‐C30 GHS and EQ‐5D‐5L VAS with talquetamab 0.8 mg/kg Q2W. EORTC QLQ‐C30 GHS and EQ‐5D‐5L VAS scores range from 0 to 100. For EQ‐5D‐5L VAS and GHS scales, higher scores represent better health and functioning. BL indicates baseline; C, cycle; EORTC QLQ‐C30, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30; EQ‐5D‐5L VAS, EuroQol 5‐Dimension 5‐Level Visual Analogue Scale; GHS, global health status; Q2W, every other week.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Least‐squares mean changes from baseline in EORTC QLQ‐C30 (A) functional and (B) symptom scales with talquetamab 0.8 mg/kg Q2W. EORTC QLQ‐C30 scores range from 0 to 100. For functional scales, higher scores represent better health and functioning. For symptom‐oriented scales, higher scores correspond to worse symptom severity. BL indicates baseline; C, cycle; CF, cognitive functioning; EF, emotional functioning; EORTC QLQ‐C30, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30; GHS, global health status; LS, least squares; PF, physical functioning; Q2W, every other week; RF, role functioning; SF, social functioning.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
PGIS disease severity scores over time with talquetamab 0.8 mg/kg Q2W. Via a five‐point verbal rating scale, the PGIS assessed the severity of patients’ current pain. BL indicates baseline; C, cycle; PGIS, Patient Global Impression of Severity; Q2W, every other week.

References

    1. Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Terpos E, et al. Multiple myeloma: EHA‐ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(3):309‐322. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mikhael J, Ismaila N, Cheung MC, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma: ASCO and CCO joint clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(14):1228‐1263. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02096 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kamal M, Wang XS, Shi Q, et al. Symptom burden and its functional impact in patients with “symptomatic” relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29(1):467‐475. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05493-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baz R, Lin HM, Hui AM, et al. Development of a conceptual model to illustrate the impact of multiple myeloma and its treatment on health‐related quality of life. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(9):2789‐2797. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2644-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larsen RF, Jarden M, Minet LR, Frolund UC, Moller S, Abildgaard N. Physical function in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma; a Danish cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6637-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

Grants and funding