Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Jul 1;67(7):ezaf227.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf227.

External Validation of Mortality Prediction Models in Japanese Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Registry

Affiliations
Observational Study

External Validation of Mortality Prediction Models in Japanese Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Registry

Ryo Shibata et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: Mortality prediction models (MPMs) play a crucial role in risk assessment for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but their external validity in Japanese patients remains unclear. This study evaluated the performance of existing short-term (30-day) and long-term (1-year) MPMs with Japanese TAVR patients.

Methods: We analysed patients who underwent TAVR between 2016 and 2023 in the KPUM transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) registry, a prospective multicentre registry in Japan. Five short-term (30-day) MPMs (Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality [STS-PRoM], French Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards registry [FRANCE-2], Observational Study Of Appropriateness, Efficacy And Effectiveness of AVR-TAVR Procedures For the Treatment Of Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis registry [OBSERVANT], American College of Cardiology-TAVI [ACC-TAVI], and Netherlands Heart Registration [NHR] models) and 3 long-term (1-year) MPMs (Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention-TAVI [OCEAN-TAVI], Osaka University, and TAVR-Risk [TARI] models) were validated. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AU-ROC) for discrimination and calibration plots/slope/intercept for calibration. Intercept recalibration was performed for short-term MPMs.

Results: Among 1756 patients analysed for short-term mortality, the mortality risk was 1.4% (n = 25), while among 1235 patients analysed for long-term mortality, the mortality risk was 14.5% (n = 179), respectively. Among short-term MPMs, NHR (AU-ROC: 0.82) and STS-PRoM (0.78) showed the highest discrimination, though all models overestimated mortality risk, which improved after intercept recalibration. Among long-term MPMs, the OCEAN-TAVI and Osaka University models (AU-ROC: 0.75) showed the highest discrimination, with the OCEAN-TAVI demonstrating the best calibration.

Conclusions: In Japanese TAVR patients, STS-PRoM and NHR models showed superior short-term performance after recalibration, while OCEAN-TAVI demonstrated the best overall long-term performance. Future research should explore machine learning-based models to improve risk prediction accuracy and clinical applicability.

Keywords: aortic stenosis; calibration; discrimination; external validation; mortality; prediction model; transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

PubMed Disclaimer

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources