Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 9:27:e66097.
doi: 10.2196/66097.

Association Between COVID-19 During Pregnancy and Preterm Birth by Trimester of Infection: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Large-Scale Social Media Data

Affiliations

Association Between COVID-19 During Pregnancy and Preterm Birth by Trimester of Infection: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Large-Scale Social Media Data

Ari Z Klein et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth, defined as birth at <37 weeks of gestation, is the leading cause of neonatal death globally and the second leading cause of infant mortality in the United States. There is mounting evidence that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth; however, data remain limited by trimester of infection. The ability to study COVID-19 infection during the earlier stages of pregnancy has been limited by available sources of data.

Objective: The objective of this study was to use self-reports in large-scale social media data to assess the association between the trimester of COVID-19 infection and preterm birth.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used natural language processing and machine learning, followed by manual validation, to identify self-reports of pregnancy on Twitter and to search these users' collection of publicly available tweets for self-reports of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy and, subsequently, a preterm birth or term birth outcome. Among the users who reported their pregnancy on Twitter, we also identified a 1:1 age-matched control group, consisting of users with a due date before January 1, 2020-that is, without COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. We calculated the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs to compare the frequency of preterm birth for pregnancies with and without COVID-19 infection and by the timing of infection: first trimester (1-13 weeks), second trimester (14-27 weeks), or third trimester (28-36 weeks).

Results: Through August 2022, we identified 298 Twitter users who reported COVID-19 infection during pregnancy, a preterm birth or term birth outcome, and maternal age: 94 (31.5%) with first-trimester infection, 110 (36.9%) with second-trimester infection, and 95 (31.9%) with third-trimester infection. In total, 26 (8.8%) of these 298 users reported preterm birth: 8 (8.5%) with first-trimester infection, 7 (6.4%) with second-trimester infection, and 12 (12.6%) with third-trimester infection. In the 1:1 age-matched control group, 13 (4.4%) of the 298 users reported preterm birth. Overall, the odds of preterm birth were significantly higher for pregnancies with COVID-19 infection compared to those without (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.06-4.28; P=.046). In particular, the odds of preterm birth were significantly higher for pregnancies with COVID-19 infection during the third trimester (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.36-7.29; P=.007). The odds of preterm birth were not significantly higher for pregnancies with COVID-19 infection during the first trimester (OR 2.05, 95% CI 0.78-5.08; P=.12) or second trimester (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.54-3.82; P=.44) compared to those without infection.

Conclusions: Based on self-reports in large-scale social media data, the results of our study suggest that COVID-19 infection particularly during the third trimester is associated with higher odds of preterm birth.

Keywords: COVID-19; epidemiology; machine learning; natural language processing; pregnancy; preterm birth; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Study population selection.

Update of

Similar articles

References

    1. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000-13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet. 2015 Jan 31;385(9966):430–440. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, Xu J, et al. Mortality in the United States, 2020. NCHS Data Brief. 2021 Dec;427(427):1–8. Medline. - PubMed
    1. Pathirathna ML, Samarasekara BPP, Dasanayake TS, et al. Adverse perinatal outcomes in COVID-19 infected pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare (Basel) 2022 Jan 20;10(2):203. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020203. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marchand G, Patil AS, Masoud AT, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of COVID-19 maternal and neonatal clinical features and pregnancy outcomes up to June 3, 2021. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Feb;2(1):100049. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100049. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M, et al. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020 Sep 1;370:m3320. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3320. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed