Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 9.
doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02320-z. Online ahead of print.

Superior anal function in patients undergoing stoma closure within 6 months after LAR and analysis of factors associated with LARS syndrome: insights from experienced surgeons

Affiliations
Review

Superior anal function in patients undergoing stoma closure within 6 months after LAR and analysis of factors associated with LARS syndrome: insights from experienced surgeons

Heyuan Zhu et al. Updates Surg. .

Abstract

The present study aims to evaluate the impact of stoma closure timing on anal function following low anterior resection (LAR) in rectal cancer patients and to investigate the factors associated with the development of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). There is currently a lack of clarity regarding this issue, necessitating a comprehensive comparison. Between January 2017 and December 2021, a major public medical center consecutively performed LAR with temporary stoma construction for patients with rectal cancer. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the optimal timing of stoma closure following LAR, with a particular focus on its impact on anal function. To achieve this goal, we compared baseline characteristics, short-term postoperative complications, long-term oncological outcomes, as well as 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and disease-free survival (DFS) rate between two groups of patients: the early stoma closure group (stoma closure time < 6 months) and the late stoma closure group (stoma closure time ≥ 6 months). The secondary objective was to explore factors associated with the development of LARS. A total of 323 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer who underwent LAR were included in this cohort study. Based on the ROC cutoff point, patients were divided into two groups: the early stoma closure group (< 6 months, N = 110) and the late stoma closure group (≥ 6 months, N = 199). No significant differences were observed in baseline patient characteristics between the two groups (p > 0.05). In the comparison of short-term postoperative complications, patients with stoma closure time ≥ 6 months had a higher incidence of anastomotic leakage following LAR (0.9% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.029) and a higher rate of neural invasion (5.5% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.03). Regarding long-term oncological functional outcomes, a significantly higher proportion of patients with stoma closure time ≥ 6 months experienced LARS (35.9% vs. 47.7%, p = 0.045). In terms of long-term oncological outcomes, no differences were observed in OS rate and DFS rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with LARS, and the results indicated that stoma closure time (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.89-1.43, p = 0.042), gender (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.31-0.84, p = 0.008), and tumor distance from the anal verge (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98, p = 0.029) were independent risk factors of LARS occurrence. We have ascertained that the timepoint for optimal stoma closure following LAR is at 5.5 months postoperatively, at which juncture patients attain the most favorable anal function. Therefore, we advocate performing stoma closure surgery within 6 months after LAR. Moreover, this study results demonstrate that the timing of stoma closure, patient gender, and tumor distance from the anal verge are independent risk factors associated with the development of LARS.

Keywords: Early stoma closure; Low anterior resection syndrome; Stoma closure timing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249
    1. El-Shami K, Oeffinger KC, Erb NL, Willis A, Bretsch JK, Pratt-Chapman ML, Cannady RS, Wong SL, Rose J, Barbour AL et al (2015) American cancer society colorectal cancer survivorship care guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 65(6):428–455
    1. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ (1993) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 341(8843):457–460
    1. Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1(8496):1479–1482
    1. Asoglu O, Bulut A, Aliyev V, Piozzi GN, Guven K, Bakır B, Goksel S (2022) Chemoradiation and consolidation chemotherapy for rectal cancer provides a high rate of organ preservation with a very good long-term oncological outcome: a single-center cohort series. World J Surg Oncol 20(1):358

LinkOut - more resources