Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 9;25(1):2416.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23174-5.

Occupational health complaints and demographic features of farmers exposed to agrochemicals during agricultural activity

Affiliations

Occupational health complaints and demographic features of farmers exposed to agrochemicals during agricultural activity

Dhananjayan Venugopal et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: This cross-sectional study evaluates occupational health hazards among farmers' exposure to pesticides in Chikkaballapura, Karnataka, India, focusing on health complaints, demographic factors, occupational history and pesticide-handling practices.

Methods: A total of 226 participants were recruited, comprising 109 exposed farmers and 117 unexposed controls matched by age and gender. Structured questionnaires addressing demographics,and lifestyle characteristics, pesticide application practices, management procedures, and health complaints were used to gather data.

Results: Significant demographic disparities emerged, with a higher prevalence of younger individuals (≤ 30 years) in the exposed group (32%) than in the unexposed (18%, p = 0.002). Education levels also differed: 12% of exposed farmers had postgraduate education compared to 3% of the unexposed group (p = 0.009). Dietary practices and lifestyle characteristics like chewing tobacco, drinking alcohol, and smoking did not significantly differ between groups. Occupational practices revealed critical safety gaps. The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) was limited, with only 27% of exposed farmers reporting the use of masks, 20% wearing goggles, and 15% using gloves. Many exposed farmers engaged in high-risk tasks, including pesticide mixing (62%) and weekly pesticide applications (52%), often without the use of PPE. Health complaints were significantly more common in the exposed group: 35% reported fatigue (compared to 20% in controls, χ² = 5.51, p = < 0.05). In contrast, respiratory problems were absent in the control group and evident in 9% of the exposed group. Musculoskeletal issues, including backache (32%), and neck pain (36%), were notably higher among exposed farmers. Dermatological symptoms like burns (21%, χ² = 12.9, p = < 0.05), blisters (15%, χ² = 4.85, p < 0.05), and eye issues, including irritation (11%, χ² = 5.60, p < 0.05) and blurred vision (8%, χ² = 4.55, p < 0.05), were also significantly elevated among exposed farmers. These findings underscore the urgent need for comprehensive interventions, including regulatory policies to improve access to PPE, safety training, and targeted educational programs for younger and less-educated farmers.

Conclusion: This study contributes essential data for developing targeted, context-specific preventive strategies to safeguard health in rural farming communities. In order to evaluate the long-term health effects of pesticide exposures, future research should look into pesticide residue monioring in enviornmental and biological samples, demographic, socioeconomic, and occupational factors that shape exposure risk, thereby informing policies to protect agricultural workers.

Keywords: Agrochemicals; Demographic characteristics; Health risks; Occupational pesticide exposure; Rural farming communities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All participants signed an informed consent form after learning about research-related information. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. This study was reviewed and approved by the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC: 43 SAC, 21 July 2015, 7.12) of National Institute of Occupational Health (NIOH), Ahmedabad, and Institute Ethics Committee (IEC/IRB No. ROHCS/2015/3) of Regional Occupational Health Centre, Southern (ROHCS) of NIOH, Bangalore. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Musculoskeletal pain/symptoms reported by study participants
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Skin Problems reported by study participants

Similar articles

References

    1. Damalas CA, Eleftherohorinos IG. Pesticide exposure, safety issues, and risk assessment indicators. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(5):1402–19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hyland C, Laribi O. Review of take-home pesticide exposure pathway in children living in agricultural areas. Environ Res. 2017;156:559–70. - PubMed
    1. Almeida DL, Pavanello A, Saavedra LP, Pereira TS, de Castro-Prado MAA, de Freitas Mathias PC. Environmental monitoring and the developmental origins of health and disease. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2019;27:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Dhananjayan V, Ravichandran B, Panjakumar K, Kalaiselvi K, Rajasekar K, Mala A, Avinash G, Shridhar K, Manju A, Wilson R. Assessment of genotoxicity and cholinesterase activity among women workers occupationally exposed to pesticides in tea garden. Mutat Res. 2019;841:1–7. - PubMed
    1. Lu C, Toepel K, Irish R, Fenske RA, Barr DB, Bravo R. Organic diets significantly lower children’s dietary exposure to organophosphorus pesticides. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(2):260–3. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources