Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 1;24(3):ar31.
doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-05-0149.

Student Perceptions on the Value of an Ideologically Aware Curriculum

Affiliations

Student Perceptions on the Value of an Ideologically Aware Curriculum

Ryan D P Dunk et al. CBE Life Sci Educ. .

Abstract

Recent efforts to make undergraduate biology more inclusive include developing content that explores how human values and priorities impact science, and previous work documents how instructors value an "ideologically aware" biology curriculum that highlights these themes. Here, we surveyed a national sample of undergraduate students in biology classes to explore student perceptions of Ideological Awareness via a mixed-methods investigation. Through quantitative analyses, we found that women students, transgender or gender nonconforming students, and students majoring in biology or another science field were more likely to support the inclusion of Ideological Awareness in the biology classroom. We used expectancy value theory to guide our qualitative interpretations of student survey responses. Specifically, students' expectancy of success and the intrinsic value they attach to ideologically aware content influenced their overall acceptance and advocacy for its integration into the curriculum. Students reported valuing Ideological Awareness because it can increase awareness and decrease biases. The most frequently cited cost was the potential for Ideological Awareness to elicit negative emotions. We compared results with similar or identical questions on a national survey distributed to biology instructors, which showed general alignment between students and instructors. These results support the incorporation of Ideological Awareness in biology education, emphasizing the need for more research on the implementation of inclusive content to address potential challenges.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no financial conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
(A) Perceived importance of Ideological Awareness curricular inclusion by gender. Men rated the importance of Ideological Awareness in biology as the lowest, followed by women, and our combined TGNC category rated the importance of Ideological Awareness in biology as higher than the other two gender categories. (B) Perceived importance of Ideological Awareness curricular inclusion by major. Those who had a declared major in a non-science field rated the importance of Ideological Awareness in biology as the lowest, while both biology majors and non-biology science majors rated the importance of Ideological Awareness in biology similarly. These raincloud plots show, from top to bottom for each category, a smoothed frequency distribution of the data, a boxplot of the data, and the individual data points, with jitter applied. Significance of pairwise comparisons is shown via the rightmost bars with the following code: **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; n.s., not significant.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Biology student (light-green bars) and instructor (dark-green lines) responses to the prompt, “What would be the possible benefits of incorporating more ideologically aware resources into the biology content you are learning?” Instructor responses, which we include for the percentage and magnitude mismatch comparison, were reported by Beatty et al., (2023).
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Biology student (light-green bars) responses to the prompt, “What are the possible downsides of incorporating more ideologically aware material into the biology content you are learning?” Inset includes subcodes of negative emotions described by students.

References

    1. Adams, P. E., Driessen, E. P., Granados, E., Ragland, P., Henning, J. A., Beatty, A. E., & Ballen, C. J. (2023). Embracing the inclusion of societal concepts in biology improves student understanding. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1154609. 10.3389/feduc.2023.1154609 - DOI
    1. Aikens, M. L., Eaton, C. D., & Highlander, H. C. (2021). The case for biocalculus: Improving student understanding of the utility value of mathematics to biology and affect toward mathematics. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1), ar5. 10.1187/cbe.20-06-0124 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alfred, M. V., Ray, S. M., & Johnson, M. A. (2019). Advancing women of color in STEM: An imperative for U.S. Global competitiveness. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(1), 114–132. 10.1177/1523422318814551 - DOI
    1. Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2005). Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: Seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 262–268. 10.1187/cbe.05-08-0113 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2009). Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved May 24, 2025, from American Association for the Advancement of Science website: Retrieved from https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/content_files/VC_report.pdf

LinkOut - more resources