Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 4;34(5):2547-2563.
doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-25-00032. Epub 2025 Jul 10.

"It Does Not Always Need To Be Staff Choosing the Agenda": The Experiences of People With Traumatic Brain Injury When Communicating With Rehabilitation Staff

Affiliations

"It Does Not Always Need To Be Staff Choosing the Agenda": The Experiences of People With Traumatic Brain Injury When Communicating With Rehabilitation Staff

Iben Christensen et al. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Communicative interactions between people with cognitive-communication disorders following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and rehabilitation staff can be challenging. While staff perspectives on the communication issues in the rehabilitation context are commonly reported, the perspectives of people with TBI remain unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of people with TBI when communicating with rehabilitation staff.

Method: A qualitative interview study with individual semistructured interviews with nine individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI. Interviews were video-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed through an inductive reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes with six subthemes were generated from the analysis: (a) Communicating with staff is challenging (struggling with information processing, lack of opportunities to express oneself). (b) Relationships with staff are established through communication (inappropriate communication style by staff, the power balance is skewed). (c) People with TBI want individualized communication (staff should tailor their approach, being acknowledged as a unique individual).

Conclusions: Participants shared experiences of communicative interactions with staff as challenging and in some cases leading to feelings of frustration and a lack of participation in rehabilitation decisions. Furthermore, participants expressed a need for staff to adapt their communication to facilitate effective information processing and provide opportunities to express thoughts, ideas, and feelings.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29386349.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources