Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70055.
doi: 10.1111/inr.70055.

Scenario-Based Forecasting of ChatGPT's Role as a Research Assistant in Nursing by 2030

Affiliations

Scenario-Based Forecasting of ChatGPT's Role as a Research Assistant in Nursing by 2030

Modi Al-Moteri. Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: To explore the future role of ChatGPT in nursing research by 2030 and provide a strategic framework for its responsible integration, addressing key opportunities and challenges.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as ChatGPT, offer significant potential to enhance productivity, foster innovation, and facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing research. However, they also pose challenges related to ethical governance, equitable access, and risks of overreliance. With AI technologies becoming more prevalent, a proactive approach is essential for ensuring responsible adoption and maximizing their potential benefits.

Method: A structured five-phase scenario planning approach was used: (1) defining the scenario field, (2) identifying key drivers, (3) generating scenarios, (4) evaluating scenarios, and (5) transferring actionable insights. Eleven experts were recruited, of whom almost 50% were from Saudi Arabia. Expert input was gathered to prioritize critical drivers based on impact and uncertainty. Two key drivers, ethical accountability and cross-disciplinary collaboration, were used to construct a 2 × 2 matrix, resulting in four distinct scenarios.

Findings: The four scenarios include: (1) Ethical innovation, where robust governance and high collaboration foster trust and innovation; (2) Fragmented progress, where weak accountability reduces credibility despite high collaboration; (3) Ethical fortress, where strong governance but low collaboration slows progress; and (4) Stagnant patchwork, where weak governance and low collaboration hinder growth. Ethical innovation was identified as the most desirable scenario. Three cross-cutting themes-ethical authorship, trust, and AI overreliance-emerged as critical for evaluating scenario implications.

Implications for nursing and/or health policy: This study provides actionable strategies for nursing researchers and policymakers, including strengthening governance, fostering collaboration, promoting AI literacy, and ensuring equitable access. Addressing concerns around authorship transparency, trust in AI, and overreliance is essential for leveraging AI's potential while safeguarding research integrity and equity.

Keywords: AI; ethical; guidelines; nursing; planning; research; scenario.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Abràmoff, M. D., C. Roehrenbeck, and S. Trujillo. 2022. “A Reimbursement Framework for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.” NPJ Digital Medicine 5, no. 1: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746‐022‐00621‐w.
    1. Akins, R. B., H. Tolson, and B. R. Cole. 2005. “Stability of Response Characteristics of a Delphi Panel: Application of Bootstrap Data Expansion.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 5: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471‐2288‐5‐37.
    1. Akinrinola, O., C. C. Okoye, O. C. Ofodile, and C. E. Ugochukwu. 2024. “Navigating and Reviewing Ethical Dilemmas in AI Development: Strategies for Transparency, Fairness, and Accountability.” GSC Advanced Research and Reviews 18, no. 3: 050–058. http://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.3.0088.
    1. Ashok, M., R. Madan, A. Joha, and U. Sivarajah. 2022. “Ethical Framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies.” International Journal of Information Management 64: 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102524.
    1. Cantero Gamito, M., and C. T. Marsden. 2024. “Artificial Intelligence Co‐regulation? The Role of Standards in the EU AI Act.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology 32, no. 1: eaae011. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaae011.

LinkOut - more resources