Predictive value of fetal Doppler velocimetry, fetal growth trajectory and maternal serum biomarkers for short-term adverse perinatal outcome: secondary analysis of DRIGITAT study
- PMID: 40641303
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.29266
Predictive value of fetal Doppler velocimetry, fetal growth trajectory and maternal serum biomarkers for short-term adverse perinatal outcome: secondary analysis of DRIGITAT study
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the predictive value of markers of placental insufficiency and fetal growth restriction for a composite adverse perinatal outcome (CAPO) in a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) population. We also aimed to identify profiles that discriminate fetuses as low or high risk for CAPO, and to evaluate the association of onset of labor and mode of birth with CAPO.
Methods: This was a preplanned post-hoc analysis of the DRIGITAT study, a Dutch multicenter cohort study of management strategy in 690 singleton SGA pregnancies at 32.0-36.9 weeks' gestation, between 2018 and 2022. We used data from 440 participants with available biomarker measurements, who were not randomized for immediate birth before 36 weeks' gestation on the basis of recurrent abnormal Doppler velocimetry. We defined CAPO as fetal death, adverse condition at birth, major neonatal morbidity and/or neonatal mortality. We analyzed the predictive value for CAPO of maternal body mass index (BMI), gestational age, estimated fetal weight (EFW) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 to placental growth factor ratio (sFlt-1/PlGF ratio) at inclusion, development of pre-eclampsia, highest value of the umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) and fetal growth velocity. We also used these variables to develop a prediction model for CAPO using forward stepwise logistic regression to emulate real-world clinical evaluation.
Results: In this population of 440 singleton SGA pregnancies, maternal BMI at inclusion (P = 0.02), gestational age at inclusion (P ≤ 0.001), EFW at inclusion (P ≤ 0.001), sFlt-1/PlGF ratio at inclusion (P ≤ 0.001), development of pre-eclampsia (P ≤ 0.001), highest value of the UCR measured at any time during pregnancy (P ≤ 0.001) and fetal growth velocity (P ≤ 0.001) were all associated significantly with CAPO. When combined into a prediction model using logistic regression analysis, maternal BMI at inclusion, gestational age at inclusion, development of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth velocity did not add to the predictive value of the model, because of their correlation with other variables. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve of the final prediction model, comprising EFW at inclusion, sFlt-1/PlGF ratio at inclusion and the highest UCR value at any time, was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70-0.81). At false-positive rates of 5%, 10% and 25%, the sensitivities of the prediction model for CAPO were 35.6%, 44.2% and 63.5%, respectively. The median gestational age at birth and birth weight were lower in neonates that experienced CAPO compared with those that did not (37.0 weeks vs 38.3 weeks and 1.993 kg vs 2.518 kg, respectively). Vaginal birth occurred in 69.3% of our population. In the group that experienced CAPO, a higher number of (emergency) Cesarean sections were performed.
Conclusions: In a SGA population, maternal BMI, gestational age, EFW and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio at inclusion, highest UCR at any time, development of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth velocity were associated with CAPO. A model incorporating EFW at inclusion, sFlt-1/PlGF ratio at inclusion and highest UCR was most effective for the prediction of CAPO. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Keywords: FGR; SGA; cerebroplacental ratio; fetal Doppler velocimetry; fetal growth restriction; fetal growth trajectory; maternal serum biomarker; sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio; small‐for‐gestational age; umbilicocerebral ratio.
© 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Similar articles
-
Placental lesions in small for gestational age fetuses with and without clinical features of fetal growth restriction: a secondary analysis of the Doppler Ratio In fetal Growth restriction Intervention Trial At (near) Term (DRIGITAT) study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 30:S0002-9378(25)00349-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.05.022. Online ahead of print. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025. PMID: 40451449
-
A prospective observational multicenter cohort study of maternal serum sFlt-1 and PlGF concentration in prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes in small for gestational age newborns delivered ≥34 weeks of gestation.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2025 Dec;38(1):2456983. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2025.2456983. Epub 2025 Jan 29. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2025. PMID: 39880468
-
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar;(176):1-257. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009. PMID: 19408970 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal twin growth discordance patterns and adverse perinatal outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jul;233(1):73.e1-73.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.12.029. Epub 2025 Jan 7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025. PMID: 39788362
-
Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and their infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 5;1(1):CD012910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012910. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29303230 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Burton GJ, Jauniaux E. Pathophysiology of placental‐derived fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S745‐S761.
-
- Sovio U, White IR, Dacey A, Pasupathy D, Smith GCS. Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the pregnancy outcome prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2015;386(10008):2089‐2097.
-
- Kamphof HD, Gordijn SJ, Ganzevoort W, et al. Associations of severe adverse perinatal outcomes among continuous birth weight percentiles on different birth weight charts: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):375.
-
- Crispi F, Crovetto F, Gratacos E. Intrauterine growth restriction and later cardiovascular function. Early Hum Dev. 2018;126:23‐27.
-
- Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high‐income countries: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1331‐1340.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous