Non-invasive biomarkers to diagnose and monitor eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review
- PMID: 40641963
- PMCID: PMC12240998
- DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1607306
Non-invasive biomarkers to diagnose and monitor eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review
Abstract
Background and aims: Current assessments for diagnosing and monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are invasive, time-intensive and costly. The development of non-invasive biomarkers that are sensitive and specific for EoE is paramount. We aimed to provide a comprehensive update on the latest biomarker discovery research in EoE and discuss the current state of the field.
Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Medline and Embase were searched for studies on non-invasive biomarkers for EoE. Extracted studies were analyzed for risk of bias and relevant data was extracted, including study design, participants, information on controls, biomarker detection method, biomarkers studied, and biomarkers for which statistical significance was found.
Results: Of the 239 studies identified, 37 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Across these studies, over 80 biomarkers were evaluated as potential non-invasive tools for diagnosing and monitoring EoE. While the most commonly investigated biomarker was peripheral eosinophil count (PEC), overall PEC demonstrated limited reliability. Other emerging biomarkers, including eosinophil-derived proteins (e.g., EDN, MBP-1) and cytokines (e.g., eotaxin-3), showed promise, although findings were inconsistent between studies. Esophageal-specific sampling methods, such as the Cytosponge, esophageal string test (EST), and esophageal brushings, demonstrated strong correlations with histologic eosinophil counts and disease activity, particularly through the measurement of eosinophil-associated proteins.
Conclusion: Esophageal-specific sampling methods show significant promise for accurately diagnosing and monitoring EoE, particularly through eosinophil-derived biomarkers, such as eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN). Furthermore, these methods were better tolerated and more cost-effective compared to endoscopy and biopsy.
Keywords: biomarkers; diagnosis; disease monitoring; eosinophilic esophagitis; non-invasive biomarkers.
Copyright © 2025 Noble, Tyrrell, Mules and Inns.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Endometrial biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 20;4(4):CD012165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012165. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27094925 Free PMC article.
-
Regional cerebral blood flow single photon emission computed tomography for detection of Frontotemporal dementia in people with suspected dementia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 23;2015(6):CD010896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010896.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26102272 Free PMC article.
-
Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 1;2016(5):CD012179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012179. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27132058 Free PMC article.
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33075160 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5. PMID: 33871055 Free PMC article. Updated.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous