Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 26:5:1616112.
doi: 10.3389/fradi.2025.1616112. eCollection 2025.

A comparative analysis of CT angiography and echocardiography in the evaluation of chest findings in patients with interrupted aortic arch

Affiliations

A comparative analysis of CT angiography and echocardiography in the evaluation of chest findings in patients with interrupted aortic arch

Zhanar Moldakhanova et al. Front Radiol. .

Abstract

Interrupted aortic arch (IAA) is a rare congenital cardiovascular anomaly characterized by the absence of continuity between the ascending and descending aorta, often accompanied by congenital heart defects such as ventricular septal defects and patent ductus arteriosus. Accurate preoperative imaging is essential for surgical planning and patient management. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography and computed tomography angiography (CTA) in evaluating thoracic findings in patients with IAA. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 58 patients (median age: 18 days) diagnosed with IAA between September 2020 and January 2023 at the Heart Center, University Medical Center, Astana, Kazakhstan. Conventional echocardiography and multislice CTA were performed using standardized protocols. Sensitivity, specificity, and other diagnostic performance metrics were calculated. Statistical comparisons were made using McNemar's and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Echocardiography correctly identified 91.4% of IAA cases, while CTA achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity. McNemar's test revealed a significant difference in diagnostic performance favoring CTA (p < 0.05). Measurements of the ascending aorta diameter showed no statistically significant difference between the two modalities (p = 0.09). IAA was predominantly type A (48.3%) and type B (46.6%), with hypoplastic ascending aorta identified in 34.5% of patients. Echocardiography remains a practical initial imaging modality for IAA, offering portability and cost-effectiveness. However, CTA demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy and anatomical resolution, making it the preferred tool for detailed preoperative evaluation and surgical planning. Future studies with larger cohorts and additional modalities could further refine diagnostic strategies for IAA.

Keywords: computed tomography angiography; congenital heart defects; diagnostic imaging; echocardiography; interrupted aortic arch; surgical planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Echocardiographic images of a 7-day-old patient with type B IAA: (A) parasternal long-axis view shows the right ventricle (RV) and left atrium (LA) and the diameter of the ascending aorta (AAo) above the sinotubular junction; (B) parasternal short-axis view shows the right ventricle (RV), left atrium (LA), and the ascending aorta (AAo); (C) suprasternal notch view shows the brachiocephalic trunk (BT) and the left common carotid artery (LCC), followed by the echo signal disruption, corresponding to type B IAA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CT angiographic multiplanar images of a 2-day-old patient with type B IAA: (A) axial plane shows the ascending aorta (AAo), followed by the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), which connects the dilated pulmonary trunk (PT) and the descending aorta (DAo); (B) coronal plane shows the ascending aorta (AAo) and its branch brachiocephalic trunk (BT), next to which are the superior vena cava (SVC) and the enlarged pulmonary trunk (red arrow); (C) Maximum intensity projection of the reformatted sagittal aorta image shows an interrupted aortic arch just distal to the left subclavian artery origin (LS) and the pulmonary trunk (PT), which is connected to the descending aorta via the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA); (D) 3D reconstruction shows an interrupted aortic arch after the right common carotid artery (RCC) arises, and the left subclavian artery (LS) originates from the descending aorta, corresponding to type B IAA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CT angiographic multiplanar images of a 55-day-old patient with type A IAA: (A) axial plane shows the branches of the aortic arch: brachiocephalic trunk (BT), left common carotid artery (LCC), and left subclavian artery (LS); (B) coronal plane shows that the ascending aorta branches into the brachiocephalic trunk (BT), which gives rise to the right common carotid artery. Also, the left common carotid artery (LCC) arising separately from the ascending aorta, the enlarged pulmonary trunk (PT), and its right branch are visualized; (C) Sagittal plane shows the pulmonary trunk (PT) continuing into the descending aorta via the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA); (D) 3D reconstruction shows an interrupted aortic arch after the left subclavian artery (LS) arises, corresponding to type A aortic arch interruption.

Similar articles

References

    1. Rea G, Valente T, Iaselli F, Urraro F, Izzo A, Sica G, et al. Multi-detector computed tomography in the evaluation of variants and anomalies of aortic arch and its branching pattern. Ital J Anat Embryol. (2014) 119:180–92. - PubMed
    1. Natsis KI, Tsitouridis IA, Didagelos MV, Fillipidis AA, Vlasis KG, Tsikaras PD. Anatomical variations in the branches of the human aortic arch in 633 angiographies: clinical significance and literature review. Surg Radiol Anat. (2009) 31:319–23. 10.1007/s00276-008-0442-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tawfik AM, Sobh DM, Ashamallah GA, Batouty NM. Prevalence and types of aortic arch variants and anomalies in congenital heart diseases. Acad Radiol. (2019) 26:930–6. 10.1016/j.acra.2018.08.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pérez TM, García SM, Velasco ML, Sánchez AP. Interrupted aortic arch diagnosis by computed tomography angiography and 3-D reconstruction: a case report. Radiol Case Rep. (2018) 13:35–8. 10.1016/j.radcr.2017.10.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Türkvatan A, Büyükbayraktar FG, Ölçer T, Cumhur T. Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch: evaluation with the use of multidetector computed tomography. Korean J Radiol. (2009) 10:176–84. 10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.176 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources