Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 5;13(8):e0026425.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00264-25. Epub 2025 Jul 11.

Investigating the effects of dietary and management modifications on Salmonella enterica population in harvest-ready beef cattle

Affiliations

Investigating the effects of dietary and management modifications on Salmonella enterica population in harvest-ready beef cattle

Yesica Botero et al. Microbiol Spectr. .

Abstract

Salmonella enterica, a foodborne pathogen, poses a significant public health risk, particularly because of multidrug-resistant strains. Cattle are one of the known reservoirs of Salmonella that contaminates beef products. Whereas antibiotic use in cattle contributes to the selection of antibiotic-resistant strains, it is essential to understand other factors that may influence Salmonella dynamics in cattle and their feedlot environment to mitigate and control related public health risks effectively. With this double-blinded, randomized controlled feedlot study, originally designed to evaluate the effects of dietary (high-starch vs. low-starch) and feeding management (erratic vs. regular feeding) changes on animal performance and liver abscess formation, we aimed to investigate Salmonella prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility profiles in cattle and the feedlot during the approximately 222-day-long feeding period and at harvest. Fecal, hide, lymph node, and soil samples were collected from study cattle, resulting in 863 fecal samples, 309 hide swabs, 131 lymph nodes, and 288 composite pen samples. Salmonella was isolated using standard methods involving non-selective and selective media. Among the 536 isolates tested for phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility, two soil-origin isolates recovered during the feeding period were antibiotic-resistant and likely did not remain persistent due to a lack of selective pressure. Overall, treatments did not affect (P > 0.05) Salmonella prevalence in cattle feces, hides, or the feedlot environment. However, the high-starch diet demonstrated potential as a pre-harvest intervention, reducing Salmonella prevalence by 0.20 (95% CIs 0.02-0.43) in cattle lymph nodes, which may help mitigate and control Salmonella risks in beef products.IMPORTANCESalmonella is a leading foodborne pathogen, causing numerous infections, hospitalizations, and deaths annually in the United States. Cattle are known to harbor Salmonella; therefore, understanding factors influencing Salmonella dynamics in cattle and the feedlot environment is essential to mitigate or control associated risks in beef products. Here, we investigated the effects of dietary energy (high-starch vs. low-starch diet) and feeding management (regular vs. erratic feeding) on Salmonella in cattle and the feedlot environment. Our findings suggest that a high-starch diet may have the potential to reduce Salmonella prevalence in cattle lymph nodes, a potential source of Salmonella outbreaks. In addition, most Salmonella isolates were pansusceptible, with only a few antibiotic-resistant strains identified, which were likely not persistent due to a lack of selective pressure. Further research is needed to evaluate the use of a high-starch diet as a pre-harvest intervention to control and mitigate Salmonella risks in final beef products.

Keywords: Salmonella; cattle management; diet; management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Study design (block, pen, and treatment allocations) at the feedlot and study timeline. Fecal and soil samples were collected on days 56, 112, and 168+ (harvest age). *Hide swabs were collected the day before harvest, and lymph nodes were collected during harvest. Treatment per pen is color coded as shown in the figure legend. Each block is represented bellow the respective pens in purple.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Marginal predicted fecal (A) and composite soil (B) Salmonella prevalence and 95% CIs by day and treatment.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Marginal predicted lymph node (A) and hide (B) Salmonella prevalence and 95% CIs by treatment.

References

    1. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, Jones JL, Griffin PM. 2011. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 17:7–15. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.P11101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . 2019. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; Atlanta, GA
    1. DuPont HL. 2009. Clinical practice. bacterial diarrhea. N Engl J Med 361:1560–1569. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0904162 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Medalla F, Gu W, Friedman CR, Judd M, Folster J, Griffin PM, Hoekstra RM. 2021. Increased incidence of antimicrobial-resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella infections, United States, 2004-2016. Emerg Infect Dis 27:1662–1672. doi: 10.3201/eid2706.204486 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC) . 2023. Foodborne illness source attribution estimates for Salmonella, Escherichia coli O157, and Listeria monocytogenes - United States. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC and Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service; Atlanta, GA and Washington, D.C

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources