Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 11:15:04186.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04186.

Setting stakeholder-led research priorities for advancing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Bangladesh using CHNRI method: an icddr,b initiative

Abu Sayeed  1 , Nondo Saha  1 , Shafiqul Ameen  1 , Ema Akter  1 , Lubna Hossain  1 , Md Mehedi Hasan  1 , Fariya Rahman  1 , Sahar Raza  1 , Saraban Tahura Ether  1 , Sabit Saad Shafiq  1 , Hassan Rushekh Mahmood  1 , Ashfia Saberin  2 , Sabina Ashrafee  2 , Husam Md Shah Alam  2 , Palash Kumar Saha  2 , Sabbir Haider  3 , Supriya Sarkar  4 , Mustufa Mahmud  5 , Md Jahurul Islam  2 , Shumona Sharmin Salam  6 , Quamrun Nahar  1 , Shams El Arifeen  1 , Anisuddin Ahmed  1   7 , Ahmed Ehsanur Rahman  1   7
Affiliations

Setting stakeholder-led research priorities for advancing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Bangladesh using CHNRI method: an icddr,b initiative

Abu Sayeed et al. J Glob Health. .

Abstract

Background: Sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) are essential for individuals' health, well-being, survival, and economic development. A stakeholder-led approach to research prioritisation was essential to guide SRHR-related research in Bangladesh. Accordingly, we conducted a research prioritisation exercise to identify health research priorities related to SRHR in Bangladesh.

Methods: We adopted the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method for this study. Five themes - adolescent Health (AH), fertility, gynaecological issues (GI), maternal and neonatal health (MNH), and SRH of key populations (SRHKP) - were selected from the broader field of SRHR. Seventy-six experts submitted 454 research questions (RQs), which were then condensed into 197 unique RQs and distributed to all experts for scoring based on five pre-selected criteria. Weighted and unweighted research priority scores (RPS) and average expert agreement (AEA) were calculated to compile a list of top-ranked RQs.

Results: The weighted RPSs for the 197 RQs ranged from 0.944 to 0.623, with a median of 0.848. Among the top 20 list, six RQs belonged to AH, one to Fertility, two to GI, six to MNH, and five to SRHKP. For AH, top ranked RQs included adolescent pregnancy, sexual health education, and mental health. Promoting proper birth spacing among newlywed and underaged married women were top RQs for fertility. GI priorities emphasised early detection of gynaecological cancers, including HPV testing for cervical cancer screening. The MNH research focused on Newborn Stabilizing Units at sub-district hospitals, PPH bundle approaches, and counselling on danger signs to prevent adverse birth outcomes. The top-ranked RQs in SRHKP addressed stigma and discrimination towards key populations (KPs) and their impact on SRH behaviours. There was significant overlap between the top 20 RQs ranked by RPS and AEA.

Conclusions: The study emphasises the need for intervention research to address barriers, assess effectiveness, and enhance the uptake of evidence-based and innovative interventions for SRHR in Bangladesh.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of interest: The authors completed the ICMJE Disclosure of Interest Form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and disclose no relevant interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps in the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) research priority setting process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Top 20 research questions based on cross-cutting value of research priority scores (RPS) and average expert agreement (AEA).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Starrs AM, Ezeh AC, Barker G, Basu A, Bertrand JT, Blum R, et al. Accelerate progress—sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: report of the Guttmacher–Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2018;391:2642–92. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30293-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee BX, Kjaerulf F, Turner S, Cohen L, Donnelly PD, Muggah R, et al. Transforming our world: implementing the 2030 agenda through sustainable development goal indicators. J Public Health Policy. 2016;37:13–31. 10.1057/s41271-016-0002-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Sexual health and its linkages to reproductive health: an operational approach. 2017.
    1. World Health Organization. Beijing platform for action: a review of WHO's activities (related to the” Women and Health” section). 1999. Available: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/65603. Accessed: 20 October 2024.
    1. UN Commission on Population and Development. Report on the forty-fifth session. New York. 2012.