Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;41(3):e70050.
doi: 10.1111/jrh.70050.

Increasing access to orthotic and prosthetic care in rural communities: Satisfaction with the Department of Veterans Affairs Mobile Prosthetic and Orthotic Care Program

Chelsea Leonard  1   2   3 , William Feser  1   2   4 , Lauren McKown  1   2 , Emily Whitfield  1 , George E Kaufman  5 , Daniel Abrahamson  5 , Jessica Young  1   3
Affiliations

Increasing access to orthotic and prosthetic care in rural communities: Satisfaction with the Department of Veterans Affairs Mobile Prosthetic and Orthotic Care Program

Chelsea Leonard et al. J Rural Health. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Background: In the Veteran's Health Administration (VHA), rural Veterans who need orthotic and prosthetic (O&P) care typically travel to urban VHA medical centers (VAMCs). This presents a barrier to receiving O&P care, as travel may be burdensome due to medical or psychosocial issues. The VHA Mobile Prosthetic and Orthotic Care Program (MoPOC) removes access barriers to VHA O&P care by providing care in rural VHA clinics or in Veterans' homes. The goal of this evaluation was to understand if Veterans are satisfied with access to MoPOC care, MoPOC clinicians, and impacts of care.

Methods: We conducted a convergent mixed methods evaluation with a satisfaction survey and qualitative interviews among Veterans who received MoPOC care. Surveys were analyzed descriptively. Interviews were analyzed using rapid matrix analysis.

Results: We received 598 survey responses (36% response rate) from six MoPOC sites and conducted 35 interviews. Findings included high Veteran satisfaction with MoPOC clinicians, high satisfaction with MoPOC care, improved access to care, allowing Veterans to stay in the VHA for care, positive impacts on quality of life, and challenges related to timeliness of device delivery.

Discussion/significance: Veterans were satisfied with MoPOC and MoPOC increased access to care. Many Veterans reported that they would not have received O&P care without MoPOC. This, along with the perceived quality of life impacts, indicates that expanding access to VHA O&P care in rural areas benefits Veterans. Many Veterans preferred to receive care in the VHA, suggesting programs like MoPOC are preferable to outsourcing care to non-VHA settings. Ensuring timeliness of device delivery is a key challenge, and it is unknown how satisfaction of timeliness within the VHA compares to satisfaction with timeliness of device provision in other settings.

Keywords: access to care; mixed methods research; orthotic and prosthetic care; patient satisfaction; rural Veterans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. Kirsh S, Carey E, Aron DC, et al. Impact of a national specialty e‐consultation implementation project on access. Am J Manag Care. 2015;21(12):e648‐654.
    1. Heyworth L, Kirsh S, Zulman D, Jacqueline MF, Kenneth WK. Expanding access through virtual care: the VA's early experience with COVID‐19. NEJM Catal Innov Care Deliv. 2020. Accessed February 21, 2022. https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/cat.20.0327
    1. MacDowell M, Glasser M, Fitts M, Nielsen K, Hunsaker M. A national view of rural health workforce issues in the USA. Rural Remote Health. 2010;10(3):1531.
    1. McLendon SF. Interactive video telehealth models to improve access to diabetes specialty care and education in the rural setting: a systematic review. Diabetes Spectr. 2017;30(2):124‐136. doi:10.2337/ds16‐0004
    1. Cyr ME, Etchin AG, Guthrie BJ, Benneyan JC. Access to specialty healthcare in urban versus rural US populations: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):974. doi:10.1186/s12913‐019‐4815‐5

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources