Potential role of terpenes in recovery from olfactory dysfunction with olfactory training: a review
- PMID: 40643786
- DOI: 10.1007/s11033-025-10795-7
Potential role of terpenes in recovery from olfactory dysfunction with olfactory training: a review
Abstract
The sense of smell is an important part of everyday life, yet many people around the world live with olfactory dysfunction or smell loss. The most common causes of olfactory dysfunction include upper respiratory tract infections, sinus diseases, and traumatic brain injury. Current treatment options are limited, and olfactory training is the most commonly used method clinically. Terpenes are volatile organic compounds found in plants that exhibit anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and anti-cancer effects. This review addresses the potential benefits of terpene use in olfactory training and proposes the development of a new terpene-centered training protocol. Terpenes have been shown to provide anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway and may modulate olfactory receptors. Furthermore, they have the potential to provide neuroprotection, tissue regeneration, and neuroprotection by interacting with the endocannabinoid system and various cellular signaling pathways. This study aims to further understand the effects of terpenes in the treatment of olfactory dysfunctions and to develop new strategies to increase the efficacy of olfactory training.
Keywords: Cancer signaling pathways; Essential oils; Olfactory dysfunction; Olfactory training; Terpenes.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical statements: This article is a review and does not involve any human or animal participants, nor does it require ethical approval. Therefore, statements regarding ethical approval, consent to participate, or consent to publish are not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Vernet-Maury E, Alaoui-Ismaïli O, Dittmar A et al (1999) Basic emotions induced by odorants: a new approach based on autonomic pattern results. J Auton Nerv Syst 75:176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1838(98)00168-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Desiato VM, Levy DA, Byun YJ et al (2021) The prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in the general population: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 35:195–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1945892420946254 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Croy I, Nordin S, Hummel T (2014) Olfactory disorders and quality of life–an updated review. Chem Senses 39:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/CHEMSE/BJT072 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hummel T, Whitcroft KL, Andrews P et al (2017) Position paper on olfactory dysfunction. Rhinology 54:1–30. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhino16.248 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pieniak M, Oleszkiewicz A, Avaro V et al (2022) Olfactory training– Thirteen years of research reviewed. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 141:104853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104853 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
