Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 11;19(1):370.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02523-x.

Best practices in telesurgery: framework and recommendations from the society of robotic surgery (SRS) for safe and effective implementation

Affiliations
Review

Best practices in telesurgery: framework and recommendations from the society of robotic surgery (SRS) for safe and effective implementation

Vipul Patel et al. J Robot Surg. .

Erratum in

Abstract

This framework from the Society of Robotic Surgery offers best practices for safe, effective, and ethical telesurgery. It is based on a comprehensive literature review, Delphi consensus process, and an international meeting in Orlando, Florida, in February 2024, involving experts from a variety of domains including surgery, engineering, telecommunications, hospital administration, law, and regulatory affairs. Key areas covered include the global landscape and new models of remote surgical care, technological needs like connectivity and cybersecurity, safety standards, training and credentialing for surgical teams, and scalable implementation models. It also addresses legal and ethical issues, clinical indications, and regional and international regulatory comparisons. This framework aims to be a key reference for institutions, surgical societies, policymakers, and technology developers to promote safe, equitable, and sustainable telesurgery worldwide.

Keywords: Best practices; Framework; Remote surgery; Robotic surgery; Telesurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Reddy SK, Saikali S, Gamal A, et al (2024) Telesurgery a Systematic Literature Review and Future Directions. Annals of Surgery. https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/abstract/9900/telesurgery_a_sys...
    1. Saikali S, Moschovas M, Albala D, Leveillee R, Patel V (2025) Society of Robotic Surgery (SRS) special meeting in 2024: insights from the telesurgery consensus meeting. J Robotic Surg 19(1):331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02514-y - DOI
    1. Patel V, Collins JW, Marescaux J et al (2025) International multispecialty consensus statement and expert opinion of best practices in telesurgery. J Robotic Surg 19(1):135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02298-1 - DOI
    1. Patel V, Saikali S, Moschovas MC et al (2024) Technical and ethical considerations in telesurgery. J Robotic Surg 18(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01797-3 - DOI
    1. Zheng J, Wang Y, Zhang J et al (2020) 5G ultra-remote robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in China. Surg Endosc 34(11):5172–5180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07823-x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources