Change in elevation predicts 100 km ultra marathon performance
- PMID: 40646069
- PMCID: PMC12254280
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-09502-0
Change in elevation predicts 100 km ultra marathon performance
Abstract
The 100-km ultra-marathon is one of the most popular ultra-marathon distances. While we have a lot of scientific knowledge, no data exist about the influence of race course characteristics and other geographical aspects, on race performance. Therefore, the aims of this study were (i) to investigate where the fastest 100-km races are held and where the fastest runners originate from, (ii) to evaluate a potential influence of specific race characteristics (i.e., influence of elevation and race course characteristics) on performance, and (iii) to assess the influence of individual athlete performance against the other investigated factors. A total of 858,544 race records (732,748 from men and 125,796 from women) from 317,312 unique runners originating from 103 different countries and participating in 2,648 100-km races held in 80 different countries worldwide between 1892 and 2022 were analyzed using several descriptive, inferential and predictive methods, including a machine learning XG Boost Regression model. We evaluated the influence on the average running speed (in km/h) of factors such as gender of the athlete, age group, country of origin of the athlete, country where the race was held, course characteristics (i.e. mountain, trail, road, or track race) and elevation (i.e. flat or hilly course). The relative effect of the individual athlete performance was also investigated through a Mixed Effects Linear model. Discounting the fact that individual athlete performance is between 3 and 4 times ahead in race speed influence compared to the other factors, the model rated elevation (0.85) as the most important variable ahead of the country where the race was held (0.07), gender (0.02), age group (0.02), the country of origin of the runner (0.02) and the course characteristics (0.02). Running on a track (9.32 km/h) was the fastest ahead of road running (8.11 km/h), trail running (6.21 km/h) and mountain running (5.74 km/h). Flat running (8.85 km/h) was faster than running on a hilly course (6.57 km/h). The fastest athletes originated from African and Eastern European countries, with Swaziland (13.15 ± 0.88 km/h), Botswana (11.61 ± 2.22 km/h), Belarus (11.10 ± 2.29 km/h), Kazakhstan (10.74 ± 3.78 km/h), and Cape Verde (10.49 ± 2.26 km/h) in the top five. Africa, the Middle East, and Europe hold the fastest 100 km races, with Botswana (12.23 ± 1.35 km/h), Qatar (12.10 ± 1.63 km/h), Belarus (11.24 ± 1.27 km/h), Jordania (11.05 ± 1.58 km/h), and Montenegro (10.63 ± 1.90 km/h) in the top five. In summary, elevation was the most important variable in 100-km ultra-marathon running ahead of the country where the race was held, gender, age group, country of origin of the runner and course characteristics. Running on a track was the fastest ahead of road, trail and mountain running. Flat running was faster than running on a hilly course. Africa, the Middle East, and Europe hold the fastest 100 km races. Common for the fastest 100-km race courses was the fact that they were mainly indoor races and/or Championships. The fastest runners originated mainly from former republics of the dissolved Soviet Union. Future studies might select the fastest 100-km race courses.
Keywords: Country; Event location; Origin; Ultra-endurance; Ultra-marathon; Ultra-running.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kanton St. Gallen, Switzerland, with a waiver of the requirement for informed consent of the participants as the study involved the analysis of publicly available data (EKSG 01/06/2010). The study was conducted following recognized ethical standards according to the Declaration of Helsinki adopted in 1964 and revised in 2013. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures









Similar articles
-
Running trends in Switzerland from 1999 to 2019: An exploratory observational study.PLoS One. 2025 Jan 16;20(1):e0311268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311268. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39820153 Free PMC article.
-
Race course characteristics are the most important predictors in 48 h ultramarathon running.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 29;15(1):10901. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94402-6. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40157985 Free PMC article.
-
Glycaemic Effects of a 156-km Ultra-trail Race in Athletes: An Observational Field Study.Sports Med. 2024 Aug;54(8):2169-2184. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02013-4. Epub 2024 Mar 30. Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 38555307
-
Effect of Strength Training Programs in Middle- and Long-Distance Runners' Economy at Different Running Speeds: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2024 Apr;54(4):895-932. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01978-y. Epub 2024 Jan 2. Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 38165636 Free PMC article.
-
Running shoes for preventing lower limb running injuries in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8(8):CD013368. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013368.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35993829 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Citarella, R. et al. Association between dietary practice, body composition, training volume and sport performance in 100-Km elite ultramarathon runners. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN.42, 239–243. 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.01.029 (2021). - PubMed
-
- Knechtle, B., Knechtle, P., Rosemann, T. & Senn, O. What is associated with race performance in male 100-km ultra-marathoners–anthropometry, training or marathon best time?. J. Sports Sci.29(6), 571–577. 10.1080/02640414.2010.541272 (2011). - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources