Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 11;24(1):902.
doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03565-0.

Investigating quiet quitting tendencies among nursing students: a descriptive study

Hümeyra Hançer Tok  1 , Lütfiye Nur Uzun  2
Affiliations

Investigating quiet quitting tendencies among nursing students: a descriptive study

Hümeyra Hançer Tok et al. BMC Nurs. .

Abstract

Background: The phenomenon of "quiet quitting" performing only the minimum required duties without emotional investment-has gained prominence in both the workplace and educational settings.

Aim: This study was conducted to determine the quiet quitting levels of nursing students and to analyze how these levels vary according to gender, year of study, motivation for choosing the profession, and satisfaction with the department.

Methods: Descriptive and cross-sectional comparative design. The study was conducted with 210 nursing students selected through stratified sampling from a total population of 511. Data were collected via a personal information form and the Quiet Quitting Scale (16 items, 4 subscales). Non-parametric statistical tests (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis H, Spearman correlation) were employed using SPSS 26.0.

Results: The mean total score on the Quiet Quitting Scale was 50.04 ± 10.06, indicating a moderate level of disengagement. Male students reported significantly higher quiet quitting scores compared to females (p < 0.05). It was observed that self-protection subscale scores were higher among senior students (p < 0.05). Seniors scored higher on the self-protection subscale, suggesting increased risk awareness. Students who selected nursing due to internal motivation demonstrated lower levels of quiet quitting than those influenced by external factors (p < 0.05). A significant negative correlation was observed between satisfaction with nursing education and all dimensions of quiet quitting (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Quiet quitting is notably present among nursing students and is influenced by gender, academic seniority, motivation for choosing the profession, and satisfaction with the educational experience. Curricular changes, active engagement strategies, and psychosocial support may help strengthen students' professional identity and reduce passive disengagement. Mentorship programs, professional identity modules, and targeted support for students at higher risk of disengagement-including male students, those with low satisfaction, and those who chose nursing due to external motivations-could further address disengagement risks. These findings may inform international educational policies and contribute to the development of strategies to enhance student commitment and patient safety.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Keywords: Nursing education; Professional commitment; Quiet quitting; Student engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All ethical guidelines were strictly adhered to throughout the research process. Ethical approval was obtained from the Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University’s Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval No: 2024/445). Before data collection, participants were informed about the purpose and scope of the study and that participation was voluntary. Informed consent was obtained from each participant. Anonymity and confidentiality were ensured, and the data collected were used exclusively for scientific purposes. The rights and freedoms of the participants were respected, and all procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Institutional permission was also obtained from the university where the study was conducted. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Atalay M, Dağıstan U. Quiet quitting: a new wine in an old bottle? Personnel Rev. 2023.
    1. Çalışkan K. Sessiz istifa: Sonun Başlangıcı Mı Yeniden diriliş mi? J Organizational Behav Rev. 2023;5(2):190–204.
    1. Espada M. Employees say ‘quiet quitting’is just setting boundaries. Companies Fear Long-Term Effects Available online: https://www.timecom/6208115/quiet-quitting-companies-response. 2022.
    1. Formica S, Sfodera F. The great resignation and quiet quitting paradigm shifts: an overview of current situation and future research directions. J Hospitality Mark Manage. 2022;31(8):899–907.
    1. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The what and why of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(4):227–68.

LinkOut - more resources