Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 29;15(13):1924.
doi: 10.3390/ani15131924.

Animal-Visitor Interactions in Zoos and Aquariums: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Animal-Visitor Interactions in Zoos and Aquariums: A Systematic Review

Ga-Yi Lin et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

There is increasing recognition of the importance of human-animal interaction (HAI) research in the assessment of animal welfare. This is partly reflected by the appearance of increasing animal-visitor interaction (AVI) publications in zoos. Early AVI publications primarily focused on primates and the impact of visitors on animals (visitor effects), with most identifying negative welfare impacts. This review aims to identify trends and changes in the key factors of AVIs (e.g., types of interactions measured; taxa studied; welfare impact). Covidence online software and PRISMA were used to screen papers and extract data. A total of 157 papers comprising 314 studies were included. AVI publications have increased in the last two decades, with a large increase in publications since 2020. Most publications have focused on visitor effects, as opposed to the impact of animals on visitors (visitor experiences). Earlier visitor effect studies mostly focused on primates, while more recent studies have primarily focused on non-primate species. Excluding studies categorized as neutral, there were more visitor effect studies with measures focused on negative than positive welfare impacts. However, the last decade and a half has seen a substantial increase in visitor effect studies measuring positive welfare impacts. These results are discussed in reference to growing changes in the types of studies, species, and outcomes measured in AVIs. In addition, we consider the future of AVI research, including a growing need for and consideration of standardized welfare assessments, the increased use of experimental control, and AVIs that equally promote visitor education and positive animal welfare.

Keywords: animal-visitor interactions; aquariums; human-animal interactions; visitor effects; visitor experiences; zoos.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart outlining the identification and inclusion of the relevant literature.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the number of papers and studies published per year from 1987 to 2023.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overview of the changes in visitor effect and experience studies published per year from 1987 to 2023. Note: green = visitor effect studies; purple = visitor experience studies.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overview of the changes in primate and non-primate visitor effect studies published per year from 1987 to 2023. Note: orange = non-primate studies; purple = primate studies.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Overview of the changes in positive and negative welfare impact measures in visitor effect studies published per year from 1987 to 2023. Note: red = negative welfare impact; yellow = positive welfare impact.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hosey G., Melfi V. Human-animal interactions, relationships and bonds: A review and analysis of the literature. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 2014;27:117–142. doi: 10.46867/ijcp.2014.27.01.01. - DOI
    1. Mellor D.J., Beausoleil N.J., Littlewood K.E., McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D., Jones B., Wilkins C. The 2020 five domains model: Including human-animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals. 2020;10:1870. doi: 10.3390/ani10101870. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez K.E., Herzog H., Gee N.R. Variability in human-animal interaction research. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;7:619600. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.619600. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fernandez E.J., Tamborski M.A., Pickens S.R., Timberlake W. Animal-visitor interactions in the modern zoo: Conflicts and interventions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;120:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.06.002. - DOI
    1. Davey G. Visitors’ effects on the welfare of animals in the zoo: A review. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2007;10:169–183. doi: 10.1080/10888700701313595. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources