Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 25;15(13):1608.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131608.

Impact of Microkeratome Dissection Parameters on Textural Interface Opacities in DSAEK Grafts

Affiliations

Impact of Microkeratome Dissection Parameters on Textural Interface Opacities in DSAEK Grafts

Marina S Chatzea et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Textural interface opacities (TIOs) following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) have become a significant postoperative concern. Studies have explored possible links such as stromal irregularities and viscoelastic usage, but the exact cause of TIOs remains unclear. PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between microkeratome dissection parameters and the development of textural interface opacities in DSAEK grafts utilizing the "M-TIO" grading scale for standardized assessment. Methods: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of DSAEK-processed corneal grafts, prepared with the same microkeratome and technique for transplantation at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, underwent blinded analysis using a newly developed grading scale termed "M-TIO". This analysis aimed to evaluate and categorize the occurrence of TIO, explore its potential correlation with graft characteristics prior to DSAEK preparation, and assess specific stages of the DSAEK dissection process. Data collected included the size of the microkeratome head used, the difference between the head and the actual stromal cut, and the difference between the pre-cut graft thickness and post-cut DSAEK lenticule thickness. Results: The study retrospectively included 422 donor corneas transplanted from 2019 to 2023. Variables associated with TIO in the final multivariable ordinal logistic model included the difference between the pre-cut graft thickness and the post-cut DSAEK lenticule thickness (OR: 1.57 [99% CI: 1.22 to 2.06] per 50 µm) and microkeratome head (OR: 6.95 [99% CI: 1.04 to 36.60] 300 µm, OR: 4.39 [99% CI: 0.76 to 19.00] 350 µm, and OR: 18.86 [99% CI: 2.35 to 175.91] 400 µm vs 450 or 500 µm, respectively). Conclusions: This study identified a statistically significant association between TIOs and the microkeratome DSAEK preparation, proposing several factors that could help prevent its occurrence. Specifically, creating an ultra-thin DSAEK lenticule from an initially thick graft using a smaller microkeratome head with the slow single-pass technique may increase the risk of TIOs. In contrast, utilizing a larger microkeratome head can improve stromal thickness consistency, reduce technical challenges during graft preparation, and lower the risk of TIOs.

Keywords: DSAEK; TIO; interface; microkeratome; opacities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Slit-lamp photograph following DSAEK depicting the diffuse TIO.
Figure 2
Figure 2
“M-TIO” Grading Scale of DSAEK grafts assessing TIO prior to transplantation. Red arrows indicate irregular hyperreflective areas representing TIOs in the graft interface.

References

    1. Van Meter W., Mathews P., Philippy B., DeMatteo J. 2023 Eye Banking Statistical Report—Executive Summary. Eye Bank. Corneal Transplant. 2024;3:e0034. doi: 10.1097/ebct.0000000000000034. - DOI
    1. Ruzza A., Parekh M., Avoni L., Wojcik G., Ferrari S., Desneux L., Ponzin D., Levis H.J., Romano V. Ultra-Thin DSAEK Using an Innovative Artificial Anterior Chamber Pressuriser: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2021;259:1871–1877. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05194-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Droutsas K., Petrelli M., Miltsakakis D., Andreanos K., Karagianni A., Lazaridis A., Koutsandrea C., Kymionis G. Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty. J. Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2018/5924058. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Busin M., Patel A.K., Scorcia V., Ponzin D. Microkeratome-Assisted Preparation of Ultrathin Grafts for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53:521. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7753. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dickman M.M., Kruit P.J., Remeijer L., van Rooij J., Van der Lelij A., Wijdh R.H.J., van den Biggelaar F.J.H.M., Berendschot T.T.J.M., Nuijts R.M.M.A. A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus DSAEK. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:2276–2284. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.036. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources